2002
DOI: 10.1108/02637470210428347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of transmission lines on property values: coming to terms with stigma

Abstract: The impact of power transmission lines on property values remains insufficiently explored and inconclusively theorised. This paper provides a platform for examining what appears to be a general phenomenon of price depreciation of land abutting power lines. A large scale international literature review is organised in terms of a thematic model as a prelude to a précis of key papers discussing the power line/property value nexus. Broadening the account, attention turns to the issue of stigma which has different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such visual impacts may also come with other collateral impacts, such as reducing property values, harming fauna and flora and being perceived to threaten health due to electromagnetic fields, which in turn usually also shape negative perceptions about these infrastructures (Elliott & Wadley, 2002;Soini et al, 2011). Recent cases of public opposition to high voltage power lines in the UK further corroborate those findings (e.g., Save Our Valley, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such visual impacts may also come with other collateral impacts, such as reducing property values, harming fauna and flora and being perceived to threaten health due to electromagnetic fields, which in turn usually also shape negative perceptions about these infrastructures (Elliott & Wadley, 2002;Soini et al, 2011). Recent cases of public opposition to high voltage power lines in the UK further corroborate those findings (e.g., Save Our Valley, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These authors proposed a conceptual framework to understand the factors explaining acceptance or opposition for new powerlines that includes the role of aesthetics as a predictor of attitudes towards transmission lines and, through this, of acceptance or opposition. However, despite the fact that public opposition to high voltage power lines continues to exist and to have high visibility (DevineWright et al, 2010), the social and psychological aspects related with electricity networks in general have received little attention (see Soini et al, 2011) and, particularly, the visual impacts of pylons (Elliott & Wadley, 2002).…”
Section: Public Perceptions Of High-voltage Power Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control over the risk source is a key issue that could explain different risk perceptions related to EMF. For example, the EMF strength of a hairdryer (at 30 cm) is comparable to that directly beneath a 275 kV power-line (Elliott & Wadley 2002). However, there is far less public concern about the health effects of hairdryers than there is about high-voltage power-lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effect of overhead high-voltage power-lines on the value of real estate often influences owners' attitudes, consciously or unconsciously. This impact has attracted the attention of many studies, although no conclusive results have been drawn (Furby et al 1988a;Kroll & Priestley 1992;Elliott & Wadley 2002;Sims & Dent 2005;Chalmers & Voorvaart 2009). Kinnard and Dickey (1995) noted that 'fear (whether reasonable or not) is (legally) admissible as an explanation of why diminution in property value has occurred' (p. 25).…”
Section: High-voltage Power-lines: Perceived Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Elliott and Wadley, 2002). While, overall, health effects remain inconclusive, public concern continues, as evidenced by transmission utilities' adopting conservative measures towards the siting and operation of infrastructure (Linder, 1995).…”
Section: Authoritative Commentary Comes From the Australian Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%