2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of treatment package time on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze the survival impact of prolonged treatment intervals, modeled as continuous variables. Optimal thresholds of DTS, SRT, and RTD that estimated the largest differences in OS were identified through recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) . Kaplan‐Meier models were then used to estimate survival based on these thresholds, with comparisons via log‐rank tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze the survival impact of prolonged treatment intervals, modeled as continuous variables. Optimal thresholds of DTS, SRT, and RTD that estimated the largest differences in OS were identified through recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) . Kaplan‐Meier models were then used to estimate survival based on these thresholds, with comparisons via log‐rank tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaplan‐Meier models were then used to estimate survival based on these thresholds, with comparisons via log‐rank tests. To confirm the predictive value of these cutoffs after controlling for other covariates, we performed multivariable Cox regression with DTS, SRT, and RTD modeled as continuous variables using restricted cubic splines with 4 knots with the RPA‐derived thresholds as the reference values …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In separate retrospective analyses, Parsons et al and Rosenthal et al found that prolongation of TPT longer than 100 days (approximately 14 weeks) predicted for worse locoregional control and survival in combined modality treatment of mHNSCC. 9,10 Other retrospective series have reported a deleterious effect of TPT prolongation on survival with earlier cut-points of 11 weeks 12 and 87 days, respectively. 11 More robust data from prospective randomized control trials also suggests a deleterious effect of TPT prolongation in mHNSCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5,6 In mucosal HNSCC (mHNSCC), prolongation of treatment package time (TPT -the interval between date of surgery and completion of PORT) beyond 11 to 14 weeks reduces both locoregional control and overall survival. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Although there is radiobiologic evidence to support the minimization of treatment delays in single modality definitive radiation therapy for cutaneous SCC, 13 there is a paucity of data on the effect of TPT in combined modality treatment. 14 Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of TPT on tumor control and survival outcomes in node-positive cHNSCC treated with curative surgery and PORT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These treatment interruptions would be of utmost concern for tumors in which overall treatment time significantly impacts outcomes such as head and neck cancers and cervical cancers. 14,15 On the other hand, treatment delays may also be due to strains on the healthcare system in the setting of a pandemic due to travel restrictions, availability of workforce, and/ or lack of access to hospital care. 16 If possible, travel restrictions for the general public should be tailored for patients with cancer, such as being done currently in Italy.…”
Section: Setup Of Different Treatment Delivery Counters With Dedicatementioning
confidence: 99%