2013
DOI: 10.1075/bct.50.05och
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of typological factors in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition

Abstract: The present study compares (1) monolingual English vs. French adults and children and (2) simultaneous French-English bilingual children who describe caused motion events. The results concerning L1 speakers showed developmental progressions in both languages, e.g. utterance complexity increases with age. However, response patterns differed considerably across languages in that responses were denser and more compact in English than in French. The results concerning bilingual children showed unidirectional cross… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Miller et al's (2018) analysis is based on the overall encoding of path and manner, without distinguishing between verbs and satellites. Our own previous research on the acquisition of caused motion expression in early successive and simultaneous English-French bilingual children (Engemann, 2012(Engemann, , 2016Harr & Engemann, 2011) suggested prolific asymmetric CLI in the opposite direction from what was reported in Miller et al (2018). Bilinguals' French descriptions showed evidence of pervasive influence from English S-framing strategies, whereas English expressions showed little influence from French.…”
Section: Motion In Bilingual Contextsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Note that Miller et al's (2018) analysis is based on the overall encoding of path and manner, without distinguishing between verbs and satellites. Our own previous research on the acquisition of caused motion expression in early successive and simultaneous English-French bilingual children (Engemann, 2012(Engemann, , 2016Harr & Engemann, 2011) suggested prolific asymmetric CLI in the opposite direction from what was reported in Miller et al (2018). Bilinguals' French descriptions showed evidence of pervasive influence from English S-framing strategies, whereas English expressions showed little influence from French.…”
Section: Motion In Bilingual Contextsmentioning
confidence: 67%