2016
DOI: 10.15171/apb.2016.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Variables on Particle Size of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers; A Comparative Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most important characteristics of SLN are particle size and distribution which affect the rate of drug release, biodistribution, mucoadhesion, and diffusion across the epithelial membranes of the gastrointestinal system [37]. The average particle size of artesunate SLN obtained in this study was 1109 ± 36.43 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The two most important characteristics of SLN are particle size and distribution which affect the rate of drug release, biodistribution, mucoadhesion, and diffusion across the epithelial membranes of the gastrointestinal system [37]. The average particle size of artesunate SLN obtained in this study was 1109 ± 36.43 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The average particle size/diameter with its polydispersity index (PDI) is a determinant to control the maximum cellular uptake, internalization, biodistribution, drug release profile, and bioavailability of an encapsulated therapeutic compound [54][55][56]. CA NPs, CMCA NPs, and α-KAMCA NPs prepared using a salt precipitation technique resulted in smaller particle sizes which were, respectively, 428.4 ± 21.70 nm, 163 ± 10.96 nm, and 291.5 ± 10.60 nm [28,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal droplet size of NLC containing O. sanctum ethanolic extract significantly increased from 152.5 ± 1.2 nm to 261.0 ± 5.3 nm (Figure 6a) and PDI significantly increased from 0.108 ± 0.18 to 0.216 ± 0.042 (Figure 6b), whereas those of NE remained the same after O. sanctum ethanolic extract incorporation (168 nm). The likely explanation might be due to the swollen core of NLC loaded with O. sanctum ethanolic extract [47,48]. On the other hand, the zeta potential value of NLC was significantly more pronounced than that of NE.…”
Section: Nanodelivery Systems Containing O Sanctum Ethanolic Extractmentioning
confidence: 97%