2013
DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.v6i3.351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of weight matrices on parameter estimation and inference: A case study of binary response using land-use data

Abstract: This paper develops two new models and evaluates the impact of using different weight matrices on parameter estimates and inference in three distinct spatial specifications for discrete response. These specifications rely on a conventional, sparse, inverse-distance weight matrix for a spatial autoregressive probit (SARP) model, a spatial autoregressive approach where the weight matrix includes an endogenous distance-decay parameter (SARPα), and a matrix exponential spatial specification for probit (MESSP). The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six different land use types were identified in the study area to classify each land parcel. A six point rating scale related to the classes was designed to help experts provide subjective ratings based on a land use weighted matrix table (Wang et al 2013): rating values of four and above represented values denoting positive accuracy measures of a land use classification, while those of three and below denoted negative accuracy measures.…”
Section: Thematic Accuracy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six different land use types were identified in the study area to classify each land parcel. A six point rating scale related to the classes was designed to help experts provide subjective ratings based on a land use weighted matrix table (Wang et al 2013): rating values of four and above represented values denoting positive accuracy measures of a land use classification, while those of three and below denoted negative accuracy measures.…”
Section: Thematic Accuracy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct and indirect effects are different from the estimates of the response parameters and from the estimates of neighbors' covariates. As LeSage and Pace (2009) and Wang et al (2013) discussed, these differences can be explained by the feedback effects (Indirect effects), which return to the municipality after passing through the surrounding municipalities. In contrast, direct effects account for the (spatially immediate) effects that the explicative variables produce in the place in which they were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors such as LeSage and Pace (2009) and Wang et al . (2013) have properly detailed the choice between the models’ specifications and the potential specifications of the spatial weight matrix W . The methodological strategy focuses on a Bayesian comparison approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This seems in contrast to LeSage and Pace (2014) who find little theoretical support for marked differences in inference. However, LeSage and Pace (2014) do not rule out the possibility that different matrix choices have an impact on the results (see also Wang, Kockelman and Wang 2013).…”
Section: Choice Of Spatial Weights Matrix and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%