1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01406953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of word processing on the preparation and submission of written essays in a tertiary course of study

Abstract: Abstract. This study investigated whether the use of word processing in the creation and submission of written essays by tertiary students, resulted in the achievement of higher grades compared with conventional methods. The study was conducted among 240 student teachers in the first year of a degree course and studying a pre-service unit in teacher education. Students' marks in an essay were gathered along with details of the submission method used; word processed, typed or hand-written. Initial statistical t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enquiry 3. Oliver and Kerr (1993) studied the marks obtained by 240 student teachers who submitted essays in either a handwritten, typewritten or word-processed form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enquiry 3. Oliver and Kerr (1993) studied the marks obtained by 240 student teachers who submitted essays in either a handwritten, typewritten or word-processed form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They confirm that those students electing to type their examinations do in practice avail themselves of the option to edit and revise their text; they deliberately changed words and moved sentences in an effort to improve their essays. Others have found this type of behaviour to lead to an increase in the mark awarded (Burke and Cizek, 2006; Oliver and Kerr, 1993). Additionally, most students can type more than they can handwrite in an essay, and length is correlated with quality for word-processed scripts (Lovett et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others use a computer throughout the process, and may ‘plant’ key points and then ‘grow’ further associated content around them. Students who review and revise their work often are rewarded with a consequent improvement in their mark (Burke and Cizek, 2006; Oliver and Kerr, 1993). In contrast, in an examination, students may not have time to revise their words; hence the ability to handwrite or to type quickly, together with the approach they used to generate an acceptable written response in limited time, although not necessarily the key factors in performance, might become more important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using a word processor it is easy to review your work and make small but significant changes, and there is much less incentive to write in a highly linear fashion (Ferris 2002). Oliver and Kerr (1993) demonstrated a positive correlation between score and number of revisions of a text. For students who are proficient typists there is clearly the opportunity to write more, as well as the opportunity to revise and reshape what is initially written.…”
Section: Initial Considerations About Fairness and Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%