2019
DOI: 10.1108/ijchm-04-2018-0330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of workplace bullying on hotel employees’ well-being

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the moderating effects of organizational justice and workplace friendship on the relationship between workplace bullying and hotel employees’ well-being. Design/methodology/approach The research sample included 310 entry-level employees of international tourism hotels in Taiwan. This study adopted hierarchical regression for data analysis. Findings The study found that workplace bullying negatively impacted on hotel employees’ well-being. Organizational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
6
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As there are no authorized statistics on the employees of five-star international hotels in Taiwan, this study conducted two chi-square tests to compare the sample with population, based on the gender ratios of employees of this study about the employees of Taiwan international tourist hotels. The gender ratio is female, 61.3% (Hsu et al, 2019). The test results show that the chi-square value of the chi-square test is x 2 = 0.001 (p >0.10) and it is not significant.…”
Section: Sample Representativenessmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As there are no authorized statistics on the employees of five-star international hotels in Taiwan, this study conducted two chi-square tests to compare the sample with population, based on the gender ratios of employees of this study about the employees of Taiwan international tourist hotels. The gender ratio is female, 61.3% (Hsu et al, 2019). The test results show that the chi-square value of the chi-square test is x 2 = 0.001 (p >0.10) and it is not significant.…”
Section: Sample Representativenessmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Studying employees' negative behaviors subsequently became a trend. However, the majority of these studies focused on high-intensity, highly noticeable negative behaviors such as aggressive and violent behavior (Baron and Neuman, 1996; Douglas and Martinko, 2001; Yang et al , 2012; Ram, 2018), bullying behavior (Hershcovis, 2011; Glasø et al , 2011; Nielsen et al , 2012; Hsu et al , 2019), deviant behavior (Yen and Teng, 2013; Robinson et al , 2014; Lugosi, 2019), antisocial behavior (Robinson and O'Leary-Kelly, 1998; Lee et al , 2005), employee theft (Goh and Kong, 2016) and intentional food wastage (Goh and Jie, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, five items for distributive justice and six items for procedural justice were adopted from Niehoff and Moorman (1993). These measures of distributive injustice are important and are commonly being used in literature (Hsu et al, 2019). Therefore, this study also considers these measures.…”
Section: Scale Of Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%