2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0014-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact properties and damage tolerance and of bi-directionally reinforced fiber metal laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…* E-mail: F.D. Moriniere@tudelft.nl Several studies have evaluated the impact performance of FMLs upon minimum cracking energy and perforation energy at low-velocity impact [3][4][5]. However, damage size cannot be characterised only by the level of absorbed energy [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* E-mail: F.D. Moriniere@tudelft.nl Several studies have evaluated the impact performance of FMLs upon minimum cracking energy and perforation energy at low-velocity impact [3][4][5]. However, damage size cannot be characterised only by the level of absorbed energy [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low density, higher longitudinal to transverse young's modulus, less ductile and stronger than glass fibres; aramid-epoxy prepeg constituent FML (ARALL) experienced severe damage than GLARE during impact. A comparison to low velocity impact response between GLARE 3,4,5 (2/1) was reported by Laliberte [40] and between GLARE 4,5 (2/1) by Wu [41]. As it was expectable, GLARE 5 with more glass epoxy prepeg layers shows good damage resistance.…”
Section: Effect Of Stacking Sequencementioning
confidence: 61%
“…[57] 2007 -Perforation energy of Glare fibre/aluminum based FML was calculated at different impact energies. [41,58] 2007/ 2008 -Characterizing the Glare specimens based on the damage stages ranges from plastic dent, BVID, CVID to complete perforation at different impact energies. Residual strength of these different characteristic candidates was experimental through post impact fatigue test.…”
Section: Simulation Of Low Velocity Impact On Fmlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional images after impact have indicated that debond damage forms under the impact point at the interface of the back wall metal and remaining laminate [6][7][8][9][10][11]. This particular debonding damage has been shown to form during the impactor withdrawal phase of the impact event [12,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most evident separation is typically found in the surroundings of the impact point rather than under the impact point [6,7,14]. Depending on the fibre alignments in the laminate and on the location of the debonded interface, the shapes of the debond damage are something between oval, rectangular and circular [6,9,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%