The Impacts of Referent Display on Gesture and Speech Elicitation

Williams, Adam S.; Ortega, Francisco R.

doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3203090

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although GES has shown great potential in practice, current literature indicates that there are still research gaps remain unsolved, particularly the lack of a recognized best practice process. As a result, many researchers have proposed modifications and improvements based on their specific needs [12], including but not limited to: changes to the elicitation process [13], the display of referents [12], elicitation environment [7], evaluation metrics for elicitation [14], and assessment of elicitation effects [15]. This article attempts to summarize the latest research progress through a systematic literature review, to assist HCI researchers and designers in better designing and conducting gesture elicitation studies, or further developing this useful tool.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exploring Methods to Optimize Gesture Elicitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review

Cheng,

Wu,

Xiao

2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gesture elicitation is a fundamental method for constructing gesture-based interactive systems. Existing research has shown that this method allows users' knowledge to serve as a design basis, minimizing biases that may occur from relying excessively on an expert's preference. However, how to conduct effective gesture elicitation studies remains an uncertain and open-ended issue. Through a thorough literature review, this study aims to identify important aspects that have significant impacts on the implementation of the elicitation study. The main findings of this paper are as follows: (1) Factors such as the choice of participants, referents, elicitation techniques, elicitation environments, and tasks can have a significant impact on the results of gesture elicitation; (2) Researchers have proposed various metrics for selecting gesture sets and evaluating their effects, but there is still debate over the sufficiency of these metrics; (3) Various methods have been proposed to improve gesture elicitation research, but there is still a lack of broad consensus on the best practices for gesture elicitation research, how to evaluate and report results, and how to compare results across studies. These findings indicate that gesture elicitation has become a valuable research and practical tool, but further study is needed to utilize it better.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different displays of stimulus may affect participants' understanding and cognition of the referent, thereby influencing the gestures they propose. Williams and Ortega [12] conducted a comparative study that discussed how different referent displays may affect the results of gesture and speech elicitation (Fig. 5).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%