2015
DOI: 10.15185/izawol.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impacts of shortening secondary school duration

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shorter duration of high school education, on the contrary, may have negative consequences for cognitive development by compromising in-depth learning (Büttner & Thomsen, 2015) and promoting incentives for learners to opt for less demanding subjects (Meyer & Thomsen, 2013). Moreover, shorter duration of schooling may lead to increased workload that can have negative implications for learners' personality development (Thiel, Thomsen, & Büttner, 2014;Thomsen, 2015), weaker ability of learners to develop occupational preferences and eventually increase the level of insecurity among such school leavers (Meyer & Thomsen, 2013). On the other hand, longer duration may come with additional costs (higher expenditure on tuition, books, transportation, school infrastructure and extra tutors among others) not only to the government but also to households.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shorter duration of high school education, on the contrary, may have negative consequences for cognitive development by compromising in-depth learning (Büttner & Thomsen, 2015) and promoting incentives for learners to opt for less demanding subjects (Meyer & Thomsen, 2013). Moreover, shorter duration of schooling may lead to increased workload that can have negative implications for learners' personality development (Thiel, Thomsen, & Büttner, 2014;Thomsen, 2015), weaker ability of learners to develop occupational preferences and eventually increase the level of insecurity among such school leavers (Meyer & Thomsen, 2013). On the other hand, longer duration may come with additional costs (higher expenditure on tuition, books, transportation, school infrastructure and extra tutors among others) not only to the government but also to households.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the reform in Germany could decrease school achievement and thus reduce the quality of university preparatory schooling. This effect has been identified by B€ uttner and Thomsen (2015) based on data from the state of Saxony-Anhalt. They find heterogenous effects with achievements in mathematics being reduced while those in German language being maintained due to the reform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The empirical evidence available to date confirms several of these hypothesized implications of the reform but is also limited in several respects (see Thomsen, 2015, for an overview). B€ uttner and Thomsen (2015) found a negative effect on achievement in mathematics at the end of high school in Saxony-Anhalt. Related results by H€ ubner et al (2017) for Baden-Wuerttemberg show a decrease of school achievements in biology and English reading.…”
Section: The Reform Of School Durationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations