2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03612-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impaired quality of chicken affected by the wooden breast myopathy is counteracted in emulsion-type sausages

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of using chicken meat affected by wooden breast (WB) myopathy in the production of chicken sausages. Compare the technological and sensory properties of such sausages were compared with those produced from normal (N) breast meat. Three types of chicken sausages were elaborated: 100% containing N chicken meat, 100% of WB chicken meat and 50% N/50% of WB meat. The WB chicken meat presented higher values for pH, L*, moisture, cooking loss, shear force, hardnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A thorough chemical characterization of the present chicken breasts was reported in a previous paper . WB chicken samples had higher moisture (74.9 versus 72.5 g/100 g) and less protein content (20.9 versus 21.8 g/100 g) than N chicken breasts .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A thorough chemical characterization of the present chicken breasts was reported in a previous paper . WB chicken samples had higher moisture (74.9 versus 72.5 g/100 g) and less protein content (20.9 versus 21.8 g/100 g) than N chicken breasts .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Both texture analyses were carried out in samples cooked by immersion in a hot water bath (75 °C/10 min) and cut in 1 cm thick slices. Texture profile analysis, which was performed for hardness, and shear force (SF) analysis were performed according to Madruga et al . and using the software Texture Expert for Windows 1.20 (Stable Micro Systems\TE32 L\version 6.1.4.0, UK).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations