1971
DOI: 10.2307/364791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Imperial Self: An Essay in American Literary and Cultural History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Although I disagree with recent Emerson scholarship that maintains that his criticism and activism were continuous, neither do I agree with the work that this recent scholarship argues against. Earlier Emerson scholars contended that there was a tension between abolitionism and Emerson's social criticism on two grounds-first, that foundational Emersonian concepts, such as self-reliance and authenticity, were incompatible with collective action (Kateb [1995(Kateb [ ] 2002Poirier 1985), and second, that Emerson's work starkly contrasted with that of radical reformers of his time (Anderson 1971;Bercovitch 1993). In my view, recent Emerson scholarship has posed significant challenges to both of these views.…”
Section: Rethinking the Relationship Between Critics And Activistsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…22 Although I disagree with recent Emerson scholarship that maintains that his criticism and activism were continuous, neither do I agree with the work that this recent scholarship argues against. Earlier Emerson scholars contended that there was a tension between abolitionism and Emerson's social criticism on two grounds-first, that foundational Emersonian concepts, such as self-reliance and authenticity, were incompatible with collective action (Kateb [1995(Kateb [ ] 2002Poirier 1985), and second, that Emerson's work starkly contrasted with that of radical reformers of his time (Anderson 1971;Bercovitch 1993). In my view, recent Emerson scholarship has posed significant challenges to both of these views.…”
Section: Rethinking the Relationship Between Critics And Activistsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This inseparable link between separation and individuation is reinforced in the minds of clinicians and in public discourse by hyphenation of the terms. For a culture that had created a separated, "bounded and masterful self," or what Anderson (1971) refers to as the "Imperial self" or the "hypertrophied self," Mahler's developmental model was well suited and easily received. As Taylor (1989) writes, this is a self structured around "the notion of a punctual disengaged subject exercising instrumental control" (p. 174).…”
Section: Criticism Of Mahler's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%