Journal of Southern African StudiesPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:A few years back, George Fredrickson, the pioneer and doyen of US and South African comparative history, chided 'American labor historians' for their failure, as he saw it, to produce book-length cross-national studies that interrogated the different ways in which class conflict was culturally conditioned. 1 This collection of papers is, in part, a response; but only in part. In particular, it is a compilation of articles, rather than a single study, which is perhaps a point in its favour. Indeed, Fredrickson's own major works are essentially collections of discrete compositions, each one differently focused yet working together to help isolate 'independent variables that account for national difference'. 2 Moreover, producing an anthology has allowed us to draw on the specialist knowledge and varied perspectives of seven scholars. Only three of these can be considered 'American labor historians'; the other four have their principal roots in South African history. While culturally conditioned conflict is one theme explored in this collection, authors have been attracted by a wide range of problems related to the dynamic interplay of class and race. Later, we suggest some ways in which their accounts have reshaped our own thinking about the variables that account for difference, and also similarity, between the two societies.While the work of the first generation of comparativists working on South Africa and the United States -particularly Fredrickson, Stanley Greenberg and John Cell 3 -has been inspirational, we hope that this collection will be read alongside other recent works as part of a new wave in the comparative study of the two countries. The scholarship of this second generation, dating from the mid-1990s, is marked by a number of considerations. First, and most obviously, there has been a broadening of enquiry into new areas: subjugation, culture, religion, the environment, 4 and now labour. Second, by producing more narrowly-focused work based, to a considerable degree, on primary research, it has been possible to mitigate 1 G. M. Fredrickson, 'From Exceptionalism to Variability: