2011
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2011-093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implementation of assisted migrationin Canadian forests

Abstract: We outline the major steps involved in implementing assisted migration (AM) and assess, in a general way, the capacity to carry out each step in Canadian forests. Our findings highlight the fact that capacity to implement AM differs between forest species; in particular, the existence of established provenance trials, seed transfer guidelines, seed procurement systems, and plantation establishment protocols makes AM considerably more feasible for most commercial tree species than for most species of conservati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we found a large amount of published material on this topic in the conservation literature, very little was found outlining the forestry perspective. However, it is the forestry sector that is currently initiating assisted migration in Canada, with a few provinces modifying seed transfer rules to allow large-scale assisted migration to proceed (Pedlar et al 2011). We are currently aware of only one assisted migration initiative in Canada that is aimed at species of conservation concern; a research trial testing the establishment of the Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.)…”
Section: Exploration Of Two Perspectives On Assisted Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we found a large amount of published material on this topic in the conservation literature, very little was found outlining the forestry perspective. However, it is the forestry sector that is currently initiating assisted migration in Canada, with a few provinces modifying seed transfer rules to allow large-scale assisted migration to proceed (Pedlar et al 2011). We are currently aware of only one assisted migration initiative in Canada that is aimed at species of conservation concern; a research trial testing the establishment of the Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.)…”
Section: Exploration Of Two Perspectives On Assisted Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Canada, a few provinces have already modified seed transfer guidelines to allow this form of assisted migration to proceed (Pedlar et al 2011). As currently practiced, this approach involves moving populations within (i.e., assisted population migration; SteThe Forestry Chronicle Downloaded from pubs.cif-ifc.org by 34.212.246.108 on 05/12/18…”
Section: Preventing the Extinction Of Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Pedlar et al (2011, this issue) provide an extensive description of the implementation requirements for assisted migration as well as a review of the existing information, tools and infrastructure that can support assisted migration, from planning to moving to post-establishment maintenance and evaluation. Pedlar et al (2011) also present a high-level cost assessment of implementing different scenarios of assisted migration, and conclude with the identification of priorities and options for next steps, including key information gaps and technical and infrastructure requirements.…”
Section: Risks Of Doing Vs Not Doing Assisted Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is considerable debate and uncertainty regarding the widespread implementation of assisted migration for species conservation, the practices being implemented within the forestry community are at the low-risk end of the spectrum (Kreyling et al 2011)-the movement of populations within a species range (termed "assisted population migration") or the movement of species just outside their range ("assisted range expansion"). An overview of the state of the implementation of assisted migration in Canada is provided by Pedlar et al (2011) in this issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various articles summarized the ethical debates (Aubin et al 2011), ecological considerations (Winder et al 2011), and potential species vulnerabilities (Beardmore and Winder 2011) that come into play when AM is considered. Some existing AM trials and planning processes, as well as potential silvicultural actions were also outlined (Pedlar et al 2011, Winder et al 2011.…”
Section: Carolyn Talbotmentioning
confidence: 99%