2006
DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2006.9967172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implementation of the Bologna process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The widely analysed implementation process (Jallade, 2004;Amaral et al, 2010;Westerheijden et al, 2010) has resulted in a convergence of European higher education systems that resemble each other much more today than ten years ago (Eurydice, 2012;Witte et al, 2009). This major breakthrough in the European higher education sector instigated a debate about the optimal organisation and transformation process of the tertiary education sector within Europe (Kettunen and Kantola, 2006;Heinze and Knill, 2008;Neave and Amaral, 2008) and across the world (Terry, 2008 for the US; Chao, 2011 for Asia). As a side effect of this radical change in the European higher education sector, Aghion et al (2010) hypothesised that new features (more standardised curricula and degree requirements) can induce increases in productivity by stimulating competition between universities and increasing student mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely analysed implementation process (Jallade, 2004;Amaral et al, 2010;Westerheijden et al, 2010) has resulted in a convergence of European higher education systems that resemble each other much more today than ten years ago (Eurydice, 2012;Witte et al, 2009). This major breakthrough in the European higher education sector instigated a debate about the optimal organisation and transformation process of the tertiary education sector within Europe (Kettunen and Kantola, 2006;Heinze and Knill, 2008;Neave and Amaral, 2008) and across the world (Terry, 2008 for the US; Chao, 2011 for Asia). As a side effect of this radical change in the European higher education sector, Aghion et al (2010) hypothesised that new features (more standardised curricula and degree requirements) can induce increases in productivity by stimulating competition between universities and increasing student mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' feedback is acknowledged to be an effective tool to correct and improve the educational process and is prescribed to be used in all countries implementing the Bologna process [11]. Feedback is a foundation to provide any process with quality assurance and basing on it, it is possible to find a reasonable balance between teachers' control and students' independent work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements specify a standard three level classification of the study programmes. With implementation of the Bologna principles, the comparison between the programs is clearer, and the recognition of the academic degrees between the European states became much simpler [2,3,4,5]. The reform is aimed to enhance migration of educated young people providing better communication and the basis for better economic outcome in EU [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several papers address this experience in different European countries and institutions [2,3,4,5,11], some pointing out specific evaluation methods for the Bologna process [12,13]. In 2011 we conducted a research on the effect of the Bologna reform on specific programming course at our faculty as well [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%