2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01030.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Implications of Absorption Cost Accounting and Production Decisions for Future Firm Performance and Valuation*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other interesting findings are that R_CFO significantly and negatively relates to bond yield spreads, while R_PROD has positive effects on bond yield spreads. It is consistent with Gupta et al (2010), suggesting that a higher degree of RM may negatively relate to operating performance in subsequent periods.…”
Section: The Effects Of Rm Volatilities On Corporate Bond Yield Spreadssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other interesting findings are that R_CFO significantly and negatively relates to bond yield spreads, while R_PROD has positive effects on bond yield spreads. It is consistent with Gupta et al (2010), suggesting that a higher degree of RM may negatively relate to operating performance in subsequent periods.…”
Section: The Effects Of Rm Volatilities On Corporate Bond Yield Spreadssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous RM-related studies suggest that a firm's RM activities affect its future operating performance, either positively (Gunny, 2010) or negatively (Cohen & Zarowin, 2010;Gunny, 2005;Gupta et al, 2010;Leggett et al, 2009;Roychowdhury, 2006). As a result, this study could reasonably conjecture that the fluctuations of RM activities have impacts on a firm's operating performance uncertainty, namely, its operating risk.…”
Section: Main Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…() and Chapman and Steenburgh (), who examine advertising and marketing actions, and Gupta et al. (), who examine overproduction and accounting performance. Given the broader literature on the consequences of real activities manipulation (e.g., Bhojraj et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lev and Thiagaranjan (1993) Firms' fixed cost structures provide a more complete explanation on how overproduction results in higher accounting performance. Gupta, Pevzner and Seethamraju (2010), investigate the relation between fixed costs and performance. Their evidence reveals a significant association between overproduction and contemporaneous return on assets for firms with higher fixed costs and with incentives to overproduce.…”
Section: Sales Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%