2012
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of ENCODE for diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genome-wide analyses of chromatin status and transcription factor binding in various tissues have revealed that 80% of the genome exert functional role [151,152,178]. ENCODE [150,151] high throughput large scale coordinated analyses thus enable to survey potential functional sites at any locus and usefully complement targeted studies aimed at characterizing the roles of cis -elements and trans -acting factors involved at different steps controlling the developmental regulation of gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genome-wide analyses of chromatin status and transcription factor binding in various tissues have revealed that 80% of the genome exert functional role [151,152,178]. ENCODE [150,151] high throughput large scale coordinated analyses thus enable to survey potential functional sites at any locus and usefully complement targeted studies aimed at characterizing the roles of cis -elements and trans -acting factors involved at different steps controlling the developmental regulation of gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the functional SLC11A1 polymorphism 274C/T carried by exon 3 and which affects host resistance to pediatric TB (Section 3.2) lies about 150 bp downstream this predicted regulatory element. It has been estimated that 99% of human genome lies within 1.7 kb from ENCODE-defined functional elements [150,151,152,178]. The relative proximity of SLC11A1 polymorphism 274C/T with the predicted functional element corresponding to Footprint #8 (Figure 4A ,B) that is part of a chromatin domain apparently active in terminally differentiated CD14 + cells, may thus suggest that this SLC11A1 polymorphism might influence regulation of transcription.…”
Section: Delineation Of Slc11a1 Distal Elements Mobilized During Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenomic reprogramming has a clearcut role in cancer, be it via transcription factors or chromatin regulators (Dawson and Kouzarides, 2012, Suva et al, 2013). Although access to tissue to define epigenomic signatures is a limiting factor outside of the cancer space, it is apparent that many other diseases are affected by epigenomic dynamics, such as complications of diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis or hypertension (Pirola et al, 2010, Liu et al, 2013, Fratkin et al, 2012). Furthermore, epigenomic changes affect susceptibility to diseases, as has been shown with open chromatin related to the TCF7L2 gene (Groop, 2010) and parental origin of sequence variants for Type 2 diabetes mellitus, breast and prostate cancer (Kong et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Omic Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WGS allows the identification of gene copy numbers and rearrangements, and changes in noncoding regions that impact transcription regulation [19,20]. WGS remains expensive, as high redundancy coverage is needed in oncology because of the dilution of tumor cells by stromal cells as well as genetic heterogeneity.…”
Section: The Different Types Of Genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%