1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3932(97)00037-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of first-order risk aversion for asset market risk premiums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See also Prachowny (1970), who studies deviations from covered interest rate parity in a model with less than infinitely elastic supply and demand of forward currency. 5 Other relevant papers on this topic include Cumby (1988), Backus, Gregory, and Telmer (1993), Bekaert, Hodrick, and Marshall (1997), Hollifield and Uppal (1997), Mark and Wu (1998), Roll and Yan (2000), Backus, Foresi, and Telmer (2001), Lyons (2001), Gourinchas and Tornell (2004), Lustig and Verdelhan (2007), Albuquerque (2008), Farhi and Gabaix (2008), Wagner (2008), Alvarez, Atkenson, andKehoe (2009), Bansal andShaliastovich (2009), Burnside, results suggest that the failure of the uncovered interest rate parity is due to compensation for risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Prachowny (1970), who studies deviations from covered interest rate parity in a model with less than infinitely elastic supply and demand of forward currency. 5 Other relevant papers on this topic include Cumby (1988), Backus, Gregory, and Telmer (1993), Bekaert, Hodrick, and Marshall (1997), Hollifield and Uppal (1997), Mark and Wu (1998), Roll and Yan (2000), Backus, Foresi, and Telmer (2001), Lyons (2001), Gourinchas and Tornell (2004), Lustig and Verdelhan (2007), Albuquerque (2008), Farhi and Gabaix (2008), Wagner (2008), Alvarez, Atkenson, andKehoe (2009), Bansal andShaliastovich (2009), Burnside, results suggest that the failure of the uncovered interest rate parity is due to compensation for risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear though that predictability is largely overshadowed by risk. 11 This means that for many investors it is simply not worthwhile to actively trade on excess return predictability. Even for those who do actively trade on the excess return predictability, the high risk limits the positions they will take.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then maximize with respect to the portfolio at t + k. It is shown that V t+k = E t V t+k+1 indeed takes the conjectured form in (11). Starting with the known value function at t + T , V t+T = W 1−γ t+T /(1 − γ), which corresponds to H T = 0, the value function for earlier periods is solved with backward induction, until the value function at time t is computed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frankel and Engel (1984); Domowitz and Hakkio (1985) ;Cumby (1988); Mark (1988);Engel (1996); Lustig and Verdelhan (2007). Moreover, it is difficult to explain the rejection of UIP and the forward bias puzzle by recourse to traditional consumption-based asset pricing theories which allow for departures from time-additive preferences (Backus et al, 1993;Bansal et al, 1995;Bekaert, 1996) and from expected utility (Bekaert et al, 1997), or by using popular models of the term structure of interest rates adapted to a multi-currency setting (Bansal, 1997;Backus et al, 2001;Brennan and Xia, 2006). More recently, Verdelhan (2008) offers an explanation to the puzzle based on a model in which investors have preferences with external habits.…”
Section: Related Literature On Uip and Currency Speculationmentioning
confidence: 99%