2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The implications of gene heterozygosity for protein folding and protein turnover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(187 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the result of our study is in agreement with the energy-use efficiency hypothesis (Ginn 2010(Ginn , 2017Goff 2011). This hypothesis was proposed mainly based on the observation that inbred organisms usually have increased rates of protein turnover relative to noninbred organisms (Hawkins et al 1986;Hedgecock et al 1996;Bayne 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the result of our study is in agreement with the energy-use efficiency hypothesis (Ginn 2010(Ginn , 2017Goff 2011). This hypothesis was proposed mainly based on the observation that inbred organisms usually have increased rates of protein turnover relative to noninbred organisms (Hawkins et al 1986;Hedgecock et al 1996;Bayne 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies ascribe heterosis to a systemic property resulting from nonlinear concave genotype-phenotype relationships of living systems (Fiévet et al 2018;Vasseur et al 2019). Aiming to unify the theories for heterosis, a metabolic or energy-use efficiency hypothesis has been proposed (Ginn 2010(Ginn , 2017Goff 2011). Previous studies have shown that inbred organisms usually have increased rates of protein turnover relative to noninbred organisms (Hawkins et al 1986;Hedgecock et al 1996;Bayne 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both Kristensen et al (2002) and Goff (2011) argued that these previous findings can be explained if homozygosity for deleterious mutations leads to greater expression of unstable proteins by inbred individuals. In contrast, Ginn (2010) attempted to show that the previous findings could be explained by an overdominance model if protein aggregation is assumed to be a highly specific process (see below). Mead et al (2003) had already shown that the specificity of prion amyloid formation resulted in balancing selection at the prion protein gene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, this paper describes a model for heterosis that is relatively simple, consistent with a number of diverse observations from a variety of species, and provides an obvious route toward crop enhancement. Recently, Brian Ginn authored an article in the Journal of Theoretical Biology describing the importance of protein stability in heterosis, although the proposed mechanism differs from allele‐specific expression described here (Ginn, 2010). Ginn proposes that ‘The accumulation of misfolded and aggregated proteins within inbred organisms are the result of more negative free energies of folding for proteins encoded at homozygous gene loci and higher concentrations of potentially aggregating non‐native protein species within the cell’.…”
Section: Putting the Model To Workmentioning
confidence: 91%