The Role of Fluency in Reading Competence, Assessment, and Instruction 2001
DOI: 10.4324/9781410608246-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance and Decision-Making Utility of a Continuum of Fluency-Based Indicators of Foundational Reading Skills for Third-Grade High-Stakes Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
250
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
250
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The large impact of letter-naming fluency on word reading in Spanish may be attributable to the fact that letter names in Spanish provide clear and consistent cues to letter sounds, which is the cornerstone of the decoding of the alphabetic print. These results lend support for the current theory of reading that word reading is the results of efficient sublexical processes such as phonological awareness and letter knowledge (Good et al, 2001;LaBerge & Samuels, 1974;Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001). In contrast, kindergartners' vocabulary knowledge was not related to word reading after controlling for letter-naming fluency and phonemic segmentation 2 Predicted trajectories of reading comprehension for prototypical first grade students with high (90th percentile) and low (10th percentile) vocabulary and word reading skills with nonsense word fluency, gender, and treatment conditions set to the mean application of grapheme-phoneme conversion is limited (Ricketts et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large impact of letter-naming fluency on word reading in Spanish may be attributable to the fact that letter names in Spanish provide clear and consistent cues to letter sounds, which is the cornerstone of the decoding of the alphabetic print. These results lend support for the current theory of reading that word reading is the results of efficient sublexical processes such as phonological awareness and letter knowledge (Good et al, 2001;LaBerge & Samuels, 1974;Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001). In contrast, kindergartners' vocabulary knowledge was not related to word reading after controlling for letter-naming fluency and phonemic segmentation 2 Predicted trajectories of reading comprehension for prototypical first grade students with high (90th percentile) and low (10th percentile) vocabulary and word reading skills with nonsense word fluency, gender, and treatment conditions set to the mean application of grapheme-phoneme conversion is limited (Ricketts et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, studies in English have suggested the importance of the speed as well as accuracy with which sublexical skills can be accessed (Good, Simmons, & Kame'enui, 2001;Katzir et al, 2006;Meyer & Felton, 1999;Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001). Similar to the role of oral reading fluency in reading comprehension, fluency in sublexical processes frees memory and attention for word reading.…”
Section: Predictors Of Word Readingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In previous studies, alternate-form reliability coefficients of different reading passages from the same level of difficulty have ranged from 0.89 to 0.94 (Good & Kaminski, 2002). In Oregon, the correlation between ORF and the Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS) reading measure at the end of third grade was reported as 0.67 (Good, Simmons, & Kame'enui, 2001). In this study, we used ORF scores in the beginning, the middle, and the end of the year in second and third grades.…”
Section: Oral Reading Fluency (Orf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, ORF improved the prediction of fourth-grade reading comprehension beyond what was accounted for by third-graders' PC and their component reading abilities of word accuracy, oral language, and word speed. These findings suggest that ORF, even in very easy text, taps something beyond important component reading processes, perhaps the ability to integrate these processes in a fast, effortless manner (Fuchs et al, 2001;Good et al, 2001;Wolf & Katzir-Cohen, 2001).…”
Section: Answering the Study Questionsmentioning
confidence: 94%