2016
DOI: 10.1177/0098628316649477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance and Interest of Introductory Psychology Textbook Topics

Abstract: Introductory psychology students at a technical college, 2-year community college, and a regional university rated how important textbook chapters or topics were to them now and in the future and how interesting they were. Importance and interest ratings were highly correlated, and the whole course was rated of greater importance and interest than was any individual topic. Most topics were ranked between important and quite important both currently and for the future, and university students typically rated bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these results are consistent with prior work that found differences among students at different types of institutions (McCann et al, 2016;McCann et al, 2013). Future work might further explore the perceived differences in helpfulness of textbook and lecture notes/activities/importance between U and CC students and the TC students to better understand what drives these differences, differences that should be important information for psychology instructors at the various types of institutions.…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, these results are consistent with prior work that found differences among students at different types of institutions (McCann et al, 2016;McCann et al, 2013). Future work might further explore the perceived differences in helpfulness of textbook and lecture notes/activities/importance between U and CC students and the TC students to better understand what drives these differences, differences that should be important information for psychology instructors at the various types of institutions.…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, prior research has focused on studying habits in general rather than on how students study for IP. Because students at these different types of institutions have been found to differ on characteristics such as grade expectations (McCann, Immel, Kadah-Ammeter, & Priniski, 2013) and the importance and interest of IP textbook topics (McCann, Immel, Kadah-Ammeter, & Adelson, 2016), they may also use different approaches to studying for the IP course.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on student interest in various subfields of psychology has produced variable findings and may reflect changes in either student interests over time or instructor enthusiasm for particular areas. The most consistent findings in recent studies showed stronger student interest in more applied areas of psychology, such as clinical psychology and health psychology, and lesser interest in more basic content areas such as physiological psychology and history of psychology (McCann et al, 2016;McCann & Kadah-Ammeter, 2011;Stalder & Stec, 2007;Zanich & Grover, 1989).…”
Section: Analysis Of Topical Coverage In Ip Coursesmentioning
confidence: 78%