2016
DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2016.1141911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of community mobilization in interventions to improve sexual, reproductive, and maternal health outcomes: A review of the evidence

Abstract: Community participation, engagement, and mobilization are common components of many sexual, reproductive, and maternal health (SRMH) programs, but little consensus exists among researchers on how critical these program components are. Using principles of realist review, we reviewed a spectrum of community mobilization interventions to evaluate their use in improving five SRMH areas. Consistent with theoretical assumptions, we found that actively involving community members in leading intervention activities an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied our search terms to all fields. We consulted past reviews of community mobilisation to develop our search terms 2 15 22 23. We developed them so as to cover articles which (1) described interventions aiming at community mobilisation, (2) involved community groups and (3) had a health focus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We applied our search terms to all fields. We consulted past reviews of community mobilisation to develop our search terms 2 15 22 23. We developed them so as to cover articles which (1) described interventions aiming at community mobilisation, (2) involved community groups and (3) had a health focus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, chose to include only community and social mobilisation as search terms, followed by manually screening articles for mention of community groups. Previous reviews of community-related constructs have similarly included a limited number of search terms 2 15 17 22 23 25…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews focused on LMIC settings globally (n = 12) [ 21 , 23 , 37 - 40 , 43 , 44 , 47 - 50 , 54 ], sub-Saharan Africa (n = 4) [ 20 , 36 , 52 , 53 ], and South Asia (n = 3) [ 46 , 51 , 55 ]. Three reviews had no geographic limitations and typically specified findings from high-, middle-, and low-income settings [ 41 , 42 , 45 ]. In terms of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) regions, Central and Southern Asia (n = 18) was the most represented region in the reviews, followed by Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 17), Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 8) and Eastern and South-Eastern Asia (n = 8), Europe and North America (n = 7), Northern Africa and Western Asia (n = 3), and then Oceania (n = 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most reviews focused broadly on RMNCH [ 21 , 23 , 36 , 38 - 40 , 42 - 44 , 46 - 51 , 53 , 54 ]. One review specifically focused on ANC [ 45 ], one on PNC [ 37 ], and one on both ANC and PNC [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation