2007
DOI: 10.1080/02678370701264552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of context specificity in work stress research: A test of the Demand-Control-Support model in academics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
2
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
61
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this is largely consistent with previous literature which finds that despite the strong main effects of job demands and control, the hypothesised interactions are often not supported (e.g., Beehr et al, 2001;McClenahan et al, 2007). Second, our study of Chinese retail employees adds value to this general prediction by providing evidence that these effects occur through both direct and moderating linkages.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, this is largely consistent with previous literature which finds that despite the strong main effects of job demands and control, the hypothesised interactions are often not supported (e.g., Beehr et al, 2001;McClenahan et al, 2007). Second, our study of Chinese retail employees adds value to this general prediction by providing evidence that these effects occur through both direct and moderating linkages.…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, scholars highlight the importance of contextual specificity given that the origins of work stress are primarily based on the structural and organisational aspects of the work environment rather than personality variables (Karasek, 1979). Thus, in addition to perceptual measures of the environment (i.e., job demands and control), it is argued that additional organisation contextual factors should be considered to further influence the proposed effect of job demands and control upon job satisfaction (Arnold, Flaherty, Voss, & Mowen, 2009;McClenahan, Giles, & Mallett, 2007;Sparks & Cooper, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can also contribute to employees being sick. Work stress can affect the health of employees directly (McClenahan, Giles & Mallett, 2007) and the current high levels of sick leave and absenteeism may be symptoms of already existing problems.…”
Section: Introducing Employee Wellness Programmes: Reasons and Negatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. doi: 10.2307/2392498 Esta proposta gerou basicamente quatro categorias de trabalho: passivo (baixa demanda e baixo controle), ativo (alto controle e alta demanda), de baixo nível de tensão (alto controle e baixa demanda) e alto nível de tensão (baixo controle e alta demanda). São inúmeras as evidências empíricas (De Lange et al, 2003;Häusser, Mojzisch, Niesel, & Shulz-Hardt, 2010;McClenahan, Giles, & Mallett, 2007) que corroboram a validade do modelo proposto por Karasek, particularmente nos trabalhos considerados de alto nível de tensão e sua associação ao adoecimento psíquico, estresse, doenças cardíacas e diversas outras patologias. No entanto, apesar da abrangência na aplicação, outra questão que se apresentava é que, além da instância da organização, existe a dimensão individual (valores, crenças, fatores pessoais/contingenciais, entre outros), que não era tratada no modelo.…”
Section: Figura 1 Modelo Demanda-controle De Karasekunclassified