2007
DOI: 10.1097/maj.0b013e318063c707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Correct Norms in Blood Volume Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), and a dynamic spoiled axial T1w GRE sequence with 75 acquisitions (each 3.9 s) ( several slices of the prostate. In routine clinical examinations, interindividual variations in blood volume are taken into account by adjusting the contrast medium dose to the patient's weight [34]. Creatinine levels and the calculated glomerular filtration rate (e.g., using the Cockcroft-Gault formula) should be determined routinely to rule out excessively reduced renal elimination.…”
Section: Arterial Input Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and a dynamic spoiled axial T1w GRE sequence with 75 acquisitions (each 3.9 s) ( several slices of the prostate. In routine clinical examinations, interindividual variations in blood volume are taken into account by adjusting the contrast medium dose to the patient's weight [34]. Creatinine levels and the calculated glomerular filtration rate (e.g., using the Cockcroft-Gault formula) should be determined routinely to rule out excessively reduced renal elimination.…”
Section: Arterial Input Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, the International Council on Standardization in Hematology have published a recommendation [35] on the interpretation of red cell mass and PV measurements and established prediction formulae based on body surface area for red cell mass. In general, 98–99% of measurements calculated using these formulae are within 25% of the predicted norm [31, 33]. One such formula is that described by Nadler et al [20] using body surface area, where: total BV = (0.3669 × height (m)3) + (0.03219 × weight (kg)) + 0.6041 for males, and (0.3561 × height (m)3) + (0.03308 × weight (kg)) + 0.1833 for females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research radioisotope measurements, using the indicator dilution technique have traditionally been considered the gold standard for BV and PV assessment [22, 29-32], but they are cumbersome and expensive, especially at the bedside. An FDA-approved BV measurement system (Daxor, BVA-100) has commercialized the RISA technique and utilized comparisons to the ideal BV weight method [33]. This technique uses I 131 labeled albumin, requires multiple blood draws, is expensive, and only one BV determination is possible per injection of radioactive albumin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tHb, HV, VO 2 were normalised for body weight for subsequent calculations. Although body surface area (BSA) and fat free mass (FFM) are better anthropometrical references for tHb and cardiac measures compared with body Table 1 Anthropometrical and physiological parameters, total haemoglobin mass (tHb), estimated oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) and cardiac measures in endurance-trained able-bodied athletes ("TRAINED"), paraplegic athletes ("SCI-TRAINED") and in sedentary-disabled persons ("SCI-UNTRAINED") weight (Feldschuh and Katz 2007;Pearson et al 1995), there is no validated method to calculate these for spinal cord injured subjects (Bulbulian et al 1987).…”
Section: Anthropometrical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%