2010
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31569
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of cortical bone orthotropicity, maximum stiffness direction and thickness on the reliability of mandible numerical models

Abstract: The mandible structure is sensible to compact bone orthotropy and thickness at the facial side of condylar neck, retro molar area and at the lingual side of middle portion of the corpus in molars area, anterior margin of the ramus. In these areas, it is advisable to use orthotropic properties for cortical bone to accurately describe the strain state.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This continuously improving the "in silico" human synthetic calculation capability shortens the decisional time for the evaluation of the robustness of a design idea (Apicella et al, 2010;Aversa et al, 2009;2016a;206b;2016c;Sorrentino et al, 2009;Syed et al, 2016).…”
Section: Mimicking Mechanism Of the Natural Evolution Where A Biologmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This continuously improving the "in silico" human synthetic calculation capability shortens the decisional time for the evaluation of the robustness of a design idea (Apicella et al, 2010;Aversa et al, 2009;2016a;206b;2016c;Sorrentino et al, 2009;Syed et al, 2016).…”
Section: Mimicking Mechanism Of the Natural Evolution Where A Biologmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) and highly non-linear biofidel modeling of bone mechanical modeling, in silico, in vitro and in vivo tests (Fig. 5) (Aversa et al, 2009;Apicella et al, 2010). (Gramanzini et al, 2016) If an implant fractures due to inadequate strength or mismatch in mechanical property between the bone and implant, then this is referred to as biomechanical incompatibility.…”
Section: An Evolutionary Design Biomedical Case Study: Biomechanics Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies on prostheses biomimetics involving these innovative fabrication processes (Annunziata et al, 2006;Apicella et al, 2010;Aversa et al, 2009; have opened to the definition of new design criteria for more biomechanically compatible prostheses production. Figure 1 illustrates the biomimetic approach using in silico, in vitro and in vivo validation steps for biofidel bone modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite Element Models have been presented in previous works where the influence of the morphology of femur and mandible structureshas been evaluated (Aversa et al, 2016(Aversa et al, , 2009Apicella et al, 2010;Beaupre and Hayes, 1985;Reilly and Burstein, 1974;1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%