2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-004-0557-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of crossroads in faecal marking behaviour of the wolves (Canis lupus)

Abstract: For wolves (Canis lupus) scats play an important function in territorial marking behaviour. Depositing scats at strategic sites such as crossroads and on conspicuous substrates probably increases their effectiveness as visual and olfactory marks. It is therefore likely that scats will be deposited, and will accumulate, at particular crossroads where the probability of being detected by other wolves is greatest. To check this hypothesis, a wolf population in NW Spain was studied for two consecutive years, from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, snow leopards prefer to mark at mountain passes, cliff bases, con�uence of rivers, and other conspicuous places [4,22]. Brown bears tend to mark along travel routes [23], whereas wolves prefer crossroads [24,25]. is site is located at a juncture of two major valleys, with an overhanging rock at the base of a cliff.…”
Section: Sign Postmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, snow leopards prefer to mark at mountain passes, cliff bases, con�uence of rivers, and other conspicuous places [4,22]. Brown bears tend to mark along travel routes [23], whereas wolves prefer crossroads [24,25]. is site is located at a juncture of two major valleys, with an overhanging rock at the base of a cliff.…”
Section: Sign Postmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This practice increased the efficiency of the scent marks and the probability of detection by other individuals, as indicated in other species of carnivores (EATON 1970;MACDONALD 1985;EMMONS 1988;ROBINSOn & DELIBES 1988;BROOMHALL et al 2003;BARJA et al 2004;BARJA 2009). This result is supported by the second prediction of the economic approach to scent marking (GOSLING 1981), which indicates that scent marks should be placed on substrates that increase their efficiency and in zones of the territory where the probability of detection by competitors is higher, thus reducing the costs of resource defence and avoiding agonistic encounters between competitors (GOSLING & MACKAY 1990;AZEVEDO & MURRAY 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We considered a scat to be on a conspicuous substrate when the substrate was the most obvious to a human observer within a circle with a 1-m radius, with the scat at the centre. Inconspicuous substrates were all others (e.g., bare ground) (BARJA et al 2004;BARJA 2009;PIÑEIRO & BARJA 2012). A scat that did not exhibit at least two of the above features was considered not to have a marking function.…”
Section: Detection Of Faecal Marksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each transect had a length of 750 m. Because of the inaccessibility of the malpais and density of the vegetation, cross-country transects were not possible, but the preferential use of roads by carnivores has been well-documented (Robinson & Delibes 1988;Barja et al 2004;Barja et al 2005). Thus, all transects were conducted along roads and trails that crossed the study area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%