The importance of culture in predicting environmental behavior in middle school students on Hawaiʻi Island

Abstract

Researchers have investigated the factors that influence environmental behavior for decades. Two often-investigated phenomena, connectedness to nature and self-efficacy, often correlate with environmental behavior, yet researchers rarely analyze those correlations along with underlying cultural factors. We suggest that this is a substantial oversight and hypothesize that cultural factors affect environmental behavior, particularly through an interplay with the connectedness to nature and self-efficacy constructs. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed eighth-grade students on the island of Hawaiʻi. The instrument included items to assess connectedness to nature and self-efficacy (both frequently measured in environmental behavior studies) and multiple measures of behavior. Most of the behavior measures are commonly used in studies of environmental behavior, and one was developed in collaboration with local partners to reflect more culturally specific modes of environmental behavior. With those partners, we also developed a construct reflecting the relevance of local culture. We explored the relative influence of the more commonly investigated constructs (connectedness to nature, behavioral variables) along with the newer construct (cultural relevance). We found that, when we took those considerations into account, cultural relevance significantly predicted connectedness to nature, self-efficacy, and a commonly used behavioral measure. Our results thus suggest that many models of environmental behavior may be misspecified when they omit critical culture- and ethnicity-related factors. This may be particularly important in contexts with high cultural, racial, and ethnic diversity or in contexts where mainstream Western environmental approaches are non-dominant. Our results emphasize the importance of addressing ethnicity and culture in environmental thought and action.

Influence of national culture and environmental awareness on the demand for domestic camping tourism – a cross-country analysis among European countries

“…The inherent values and beliefs of people determine the way how they view the surrounding world. Therefore it is reasonable to assume, that basic national cultural values will have an impact on the environmental awareness and the resulting activity patterns experienced in any country (Halkos andTzeremes 2013 andGould et al 2018).…”

Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture: Its Essence and a Concept for Its Operationalization

“…In turn, Cameron and Quinn emphasize the greater-in comparison to Hofstede-importance of values in shaping organizational cultures. These authors state that organizational culture is manifested in organizational values, dominant leadership styles, language and symbols, ways of operating, routine procedures, and the definition of success [25]. These features of an organization not only distinguish it from others but can lead to the formation of specific subcultures in different organizational units.…”

“…Environmental culture is discussed in reference to the features of modern society [23]. The results of different empirical research have proved that local and organizational culture has a significant impact on environmental performance [24,25]. Linnenluecke and Griffiths [26] tried to build a theoretical concept of organizational culture, which is based on the Competing Values Framework by Cameron and Quinn [27].…”

An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context

“…This is to reveal action where sole decisions could not earlier be seen. In addition, Gould, Krymkowski, & Ardoin [72] stated that for people to think positively about the environment-and to make right decisions in regards of the environmental impact-is a function of having deeper understanding of the variables that influences the pro-environmental behaviour. However, these deliberations of issues for decision making, are subjected to the organisational culture; thus, they affect the leadership decision-making process [73].…”