2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02575-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of development standards for anchoring vignettes: an illustrative example from pediatric localized scleroderma quality of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, little is known regarding the comprehensive impact of various health state vignettes on the elicited TTO utilities. Vignette designs are not standardized and Our findings support the use of a common approach to vignette development [26,29,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, little is known regarding the comprehensive impact of various health state vignettes on the elicited TTO utilities. Vignette designs are not standardized and Our findings support the use of a common approach to vignette development [26,29,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Domains describe disease-specific burdens and attributes while simultaneously differentiating the stages of disease severity [28]. Health descriptions are extremely important to obtain accurate utility results, and differences in similar health state descriptions are possible sources of systematic differences in responses [29,30]. Several studies have reported that presentation of the valuation task has an impact on the values, thus, elicited [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 At the time of the study, the LoSQI consisted of 21 items across three theoretical domains ([1] skin sensations; [2] physical functioning and musculoskeletal sequelae; and [3] body image and social support), alongside an optional subscale that included 12 items about medication attitudes and relevant adverse effects. This initial version of the LoSQI also included a set of exploratory anchoring vignettes that were administered prior to the self-report items (described in Zigler et al 12 ).…”
Section: The Losqimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal structure of the survey was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the final factor structure, as supported by our theoretical framework and the EFA results. 7,28 We utilized not only IRTPRO 4.2 (Scientific Software International, Inc.) for these analyses, but also ran the same model in MPLUS (version 8.2, Muthen & Muthen) to estimate additional model fit statistics that were not available in IRTPRO 29 : the comparative fit index (CFI > 0.95), Tucker-Lewis index (>0.95), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA < 0.06). Final results are reported using the specifications of the item-response theory twoparameter logistic (2PL) model on binary items; parameters can be utilized for scoring the two scales.…”
Section: Internal Structure and Item Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this method has been successfully applied in various disciplines ( 9 , 14 21 ), this approach is relatively novel in mental health research. Therefore, in the current study, we utilized a parametric modeling approach when applying the AV methodology to a multiple-item, variable response-set scale in the domain of mental health ( 14 , 16 , 18 20 , 22 24 ). Uniquely, the UK perinatal cohort in our study was established prior to the Indian cohort, so a new auxiliary calibration sample was recruited in the United Kingdom, matched on key eligibility criteria, to generate a correction factor for ratings in the original sample.…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%