The importance of diabatic processes for the dynamics of synoptic-scale extratropical weather systems—a review

Abstract

Abstract. Many fundamental concepts of synoptic-scale extratropical dynamics are based on the quasi-geostrophic equations of a dry atmosphere. This “dry dynamics” provides the essential understanding of, e.g., the formation of extratropical cyclones and the propagation of Rossby waves, and makes potential vorticity (PV) a materially conserved quantity. Classically, for extratropical weather systems, the importance of so-called “diabatic effects”, e.g. surface fluxes, phase changes of water in clouds, and radiation, has been regarded as secondary compared to the dry dynamical processes. As outlined in this review article, research during the last decades has modified this view of the role of diabatic processes. The combination of complementary research approaches revealed that the non-linear dynamics of extratropical cyclones and upper-tropospheric Rossby waves is— in some cases strongly—affected by diabatic processes. Despite the violation of material PV conservation in the presence of diabatic processes, the concept of PV has been of utmost importance to identify and quantify the role of diabatic processes, and to integrate their effects into the classical understanding based on dry dynamics. This review first summarizes the theoretical concepts of diabatic PV modification and moist PV and slantwise moist convection, and provides a concise overview on early research on diabatic effects until the late 1970s. Two poorly predicted high-impact cyclones affecting eastern North America then triggered an impressive diversity of efforts to investigate the role of diabatic processes for rapid cyclone intensification in the last two decades of the 20th century. These research activities, including the development of sophisticated diagnostics, growing applications of the Lagrangian perspective, real case and idealised numerical experiments, and dedicated field experiments, are reviewed in detail. This historical perspective provides insight about how societal relevance, international collaboration, technical development, and creative science contributed to establishing this important theme of dynamical meteorology. The second part of the review then more selectively outlines important achievements in the last two decades of how diabatic effects, in particular those related to cloud microphysics, affect the structure, dynamics, and predictability of different types of extratropical cyclones and their mesoscale substructures, upper-tropospheric blocks, Rossby waves and their interactions. A novel aspect is the relevance of research on diabatic processes for climate change research. The review closes by highlighting important implications of investigating diabatic processes in extratropical weather systems for the broader field of weather and climate dynamics, its fundamentals and representation in numerical models.

Spatio-temporal filtering of jets obscures the reinforcement of baroclinicity by latent heating

“…On synoptic time scales, latent heating amplifies cyclone growth (see Wernli and Gray, 2023, for a review) as well as enstrophy (Black, 1998) and influences the jet stream through changes in potential vorticity gradients (Harvey et al, 2020;Bukenberger et al, 2023). Furthermore, as latent heating modifies baroclinicity, it also affects baroclinic wave activity on time scales beyond the lifetime of a single cyclone (Hoskins and Valdes, 1990;Papritz and Spengler, 2015;Weijenborg and Spengler, 2020).…”

A potential vorticity diagnostics package for MPAS-Atmosphere

“…In this paper, we describe the implementation of a PV diagnostics package into MPAS that enables the online calculation of terms in the Eulerian PV budget during model integration and thus provides the community with an invaluable tool for investigating the dynamics of atmospheric processes ranging from the mesoscale to the planetary scale in global simulations. 1 Numerous past modeling studies have utilized a PV budget framework to quantify the respective changes to the PV distribution from resolved and subgrid-scale (i.e., parameterized) processes, the latter of which are predominantly responsible for PV nonconservation and are thus a notable source of model error (e.g., Wernli & Gray, 2023).…”