2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00199-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of former land use in determining successful re-creation of lowland heath in southern England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with the findings of Navarro-Cano et al (2010) and Walker et al (2004) who found positive effects of pine litter removal on target species abundance. Boydak (2004) suggests that pine litter depth of 2-4 cm is an optimal amount for restoration as it does not prevent seedling germination, but does increase seedling survival by reducing evapotranspiration and competition.…”
Section: Effects Of Pine Litter Removalcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with the findings of Navarro-Cano et al (2010) and Walker et al (2004) who found positive effects of pine litter removal on target species abundance. Boydak (2004) suggests that pine litter depth of 2-4 cm is an optimal amount for restoration as it does not prevent seedling germination, but does increase seedling survival by reducing evapotranspiration and competition.…”
Section: Effects Of Pine Litter Removalcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the published work on seedbanks of conifer stands planted on heathland soils has focused on ericaceous species (Walker et al, 2004). In this study, the density of C. vulgaris seed ranged from 20 to 680 seeds m À2 where present (as compared, for example, to conifer plantations on Dorset heathland where densities can be up to 7000 seeds m À2 ) and was only recorded from 40% of stands planted on heathland.…”
Section: Representation Of Heathland Species In the Buried Seedbankmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…F. ovina is also absent from the seedbank of other conifer plantations in southern England despite being present in the vegetation (Walker et al, 2004), but attains densities of up to 1380 seeds m À2 in seedbanks on Breckland heath (Pakeman and Marshall, 1997). F. ovina is a poor colonist (Wells et al, 1976).…”
Section: Representation Of Heathland Species In the Buried Seedbankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences between vegetation types are indicated with different letters (KruskalWallis test). Table 2 Correlation of weighted average seed longevity index and Ellenberg indicator values and the proportion of the abundance of the ecological groups in the seed bank with time since grassland abandonment, and differences in these characteristics between grassland vegetation, grassland seed bank, scrubs seed bank and forest seed bank Walker et al, 2002;Bossuyt and Hermy, 2003). The low abundance of these species in the grassland vegetation, therefore, suggests that only a few individuals would have been needed to produce numerous persistent seeds that accumulated in the soil seed bank.…”
Section: Density and Composition Of The Seed Bank Under Calcareous Grmentioning
confidence: 99%