2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/773/2/94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Geometric Effects in Coronal Loop Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

17
200
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
17
200
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat conductivity according to Spitzer [23], q ∝ T 5/2 ∇T, is very sensitive to the temperature T. Known at least since the first one-dimensional coronal models including the transition region [24][25][26], as a consequence of the heat conductivity in the transition region the temperature gradient becomes very steep, which requires a very small grid spacing. In more recent models, the grid spacing is as small as 1 km [27] or even smaller when an adaptive grid is used [28,29]. As pointed out early in [30,31], other (turbulence) processes might take over well before such small scales for the temperature gradients are reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heat conductivity according to Spitzer [23], q ∝ T 5/2 ∇T, is very sensitive to the temperature T. Known at least since the first one-dimensional coronal models including the transition region [24][25][26], as a consequence of the heat conductivity in the transition region the temperature gradient becomes very steep, which requires a very small grid spacing. In more recent models, the grid spacing is as small as 1 km [27] or even smaller when an adaptive grid is used [28,29]. As pointed out early in [30,31], other (turbulence) processes might take over well before such small scales for the temperature gradients are reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore in larger-scale three-dimensional models, the transition region cannot be resolved using Spitzer heat conduction. To cope with this problem, one can correct for the impact on the coronal pressure [27,33]. However, in the light of the above discussion comparing the electron mean-free-path length with the grid spacing, it is not clear that this is really desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used this model to study the plasma response to the heating into and around the moss regions. At variance with 1D models having a specified expanding cross section (Emslie et al 1992;Mikić et al 2013), we use a full MHD description, i.e., the full set of MHD equations is solved together in a 2D spatial domain; this allows us to describe a beta-changing system and to have feedback between plasma and magnetic field in the critical region, i.e., around the transition region. As a consequence, and at variance with previous works, in our model the loop cross-sectional area is also a function of time and changes as the heating changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial refinement and update of these studies has been made by Mikic et al (2013) who used a 1D hydrodynamic model with variable cross-section proportional to 1/B(s), where B(s) is the magnetic field strength along the loop. Mikic et al (2013) considered the effect of varying loop parameters on the loop model solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mikic et al (2013) considered the effect of varying loop parameters on the loop model solutions. In particular, they concluded that variable cross-section area must be used for the correct derivation of densities (the modelled density at the apex was 76% larger when compared to the constant area case).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%