2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1911-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Hydrodynamics for Protected and Endangered Biodiversity of Lowland Rivers

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between protected and endangered riverine species (target species) and hydrodynamics in river-floodplain ecosystems, combining ecological and policy-legal aspects of biodiversity conservation in river management. The importance of different hydrodynamic conditions along a lateral gradient was quantified for various taxonomic groups. Our results show that (i) target species require ecotopes along the entire hydrodynamic gradient; (ii) different parts of the hydrodynamic grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest frequency of taxa was reported for macroforb species: Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim., Lysimachia vulgaris L., Lythrum salicaria L., Cirsium oleraceum (L.) Scop., C. rivulare (Jacq.) All., and Mentha longifolia (L.) L. The most substantial changes in species richness were noted in patches 3-5, but a similar trend was reported for patches 4 where a significant decline in the number of taxa, by 27 and 33% respectively, was found in 2009. During 5 successive years, a visible decrease in species number was observed only in patch 4.…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Species Diversitysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest frequency of taxa was reported for macroforb species: Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim., Lysimachia vulgaris L., Lythrum salicaria L., Cirsium oleraceum (L.) Scop., C. rivulare (Jacq.) All., and Mentha longifolia (L.) L. The most substantial changes in species richness were noted in patches 3-5, but a similar trend was reported for patches 4 where a significant decline in the number of taxa, by 27 and 33% respectively, was found in 2009. During 5 successive years, a visible decrease in species number was observed only in patch 4.…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Species Diversitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…All these factors determine the soil cover and its properties, simultaneously determining the character of the vegetation cover [3][4][5][6]. Special natural values are characteristic of small unregulated watercourses where human impact on the natural water cycle and economic management of the catchment (mowing, grazing, deforestation, peat excavation) has been largely limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also have profound indirect effects on aquatic biota via altering local environmental conditions in wetlands (De Nooij, Verberk, Lenders, Leuven, & Nienhuis, 2006), for example by dilution of nutrients and dissolved salts (Junk et al, 1989;Lizotte et al, 2012;Thomaz et al, 2007;Weilhoefer, Pan, & Eppard, 2008), or by bringing in sediments and organic matter from the river (Junk et al, 1989;Ward, Tockner, Arscott, & Claret, 2002). It may also have profound indirect effects on aquatic biota via altering local environmental conditions in wetlands (De Nooij, Verberk, Lenders, Leuven, & Nienhuis, 2006), for example by dilution of nutrients and dissolved salts (Junk et al, 1989;Lizotte et al, 2012;Thomaz et al, 2007;Weilhoefer, Pan, & Eppard, 2008), or by bringing in sediments and organic matter from the river (Junk et al, 1989;Ward, Tockner, Arscott, & Claret, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, variation in LHC across wetlands (pans) might promote habitat variability at the landscape scale, which can result in higher regional diversity (De Nooij et al, 2006;Thomaz et al, 2007). Consequently, variation in LHC across wetlands (pans) might promote habitat variability at the landscape scale, which can result in higher regional diversity (De Nooij et al, 2006;Thomaz et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floodplain rehabilitation aims at creating a diverse and (semi‐)natural river landscape, consisting of marshes, pioneer habitats (such as eolian dunes), natural grasslands, shrubs and riverine forests (Lenders, 2003). In the past decade positive effects of Dutch floodplain rehabilitation on biodiversity have been described (Grift, 2001; Raat, 2001; Nienhuis et al ., 2002; Lenders, 2003; De Nooij et al ., 2006; Peters and Kurstjens, 2008). However, quantitative evaluations are still scarce and studies are often based on short‐term responses in populations of a small selection of species (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%