2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl081955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Icelandic Ice Sheet Growth and Retreat on Mantle CO2 Flux

Abstract: Climate cycles may significantly affect the eruptive behavior of terrestrial volcanoes due to pressure changes caused by glacial loading, which raises the possibility that climate change may modulate CO2 degassing via volcanism. In Iceland, magmatism is likely to have been influenced by glacial activity. To explore if deglaciation therefore impacted CO2 flux, we coupled a model of glacial loading over the last ∼120 ka to melt generation and transport. We find that a nuanced relationship exists between magmatis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We account for a time-dependent melting rate, generalizing previous steady-state melting column models [15,16]. The model is similar to the one-dimensional model of Armitage et al [9], except that we do not consider the role of carbon-induced melting or calculate the carbon concentration. This is reasonable for our purposes, because incompatible volatiles such as carbon have only a modest effect on the melt flux at the surface [14], although it is important to consider this effect when calculating the carbon flux [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We account for a time-dependent melting rate, generalizing previous steady-state melting column models [15,16]. The model is similar to the one-dimensional model of Armitage et al [9], except that we do not consider the role of carbon-induced melting or calculate the carbon concentration. This is reasonable for our purposes, because incompatible volatiles such as carbon have only a modest effect on the melt flux at the surface [14], although it is important to consider this effect when calculating the carbon flux [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubin et al [7] suggested melt could traverse the melting region over only a few decades based on the disequilibrium of 210 Pb, but the observed disequilibrium is generally attributed to magma degassing [8]. Geophysical observations (seismic and MT) also provide constraints on magma ascent velocities, since a relatively small residual porosity points to relatively rapid magma velocities, as discussed by Armitage et al [9]. However, such constraints are rather indirect, going from seismic wavespeed, to porosity, to magma velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the deglaciation, we calculate that for a mantle CO2 content of 300-500 ppm (see Methods), an additional 31-51 Gt of CO2 is released over 1 kyr (dash-dotted black line, Figure 3d), corresponding to a 13-fold increase over the background flux. This additional CO2 is likely not released instantaneously, but is slowed by processes such as melt migration 25 . This value is of the same order of magnitude as prior estimates 25 , which found an extra ~165 Gt CO2 was released over the 11 kyrs following deglaciation for a mantle CO2 content of 285 ppm.…”
Section: Deglaciation Melting In Icelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This additional CO2 is likely not released instantaneously, but is slowed by processes such as melt migration 25 . This value is of the same order of magnitude as prior estimates 25 , which found an extra ~165 Gt CO2 was released over the 11 kyrs following deglaciation for a mantle CO2 content of 285 ppm.…”
Section: Deglaciation Melting In Icelandmentioning
confidence: 99%