2021
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10509434.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of Lake Littoral Zones for Estimating Arctic-Boreal Methane Emissions

Abstract: Areas of lakes that support emergent aquatic vegetation emit disproportionately more methane than open water but are underrepresented in upscaled estimates of lake greenhouse gas emissions. These shallow areas are typically less than ˜1.5 m deep and can be estimated through synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mapping. To assess the importance of lake emergent vegetation (LEV) zones to landscape-scale methane emissions, we combine airborne SAR mapping with field measurements of vegetated and open-water methane flux.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following publicly‐available data sets were used in this analysis: HydroLAKES (Messager et al., 2016) from the World Wildlife Fund; GSW (Pekel et al., 2016) from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre; BAWLD (Olefeldt et al., 2021a) and BAWLD‐CH4 (Kuhn et al., 2021a) from the National Science Foundation Arctic Data Center; WBD (Feng & Sui, 2020) from the Chinese National Tibetan Plateau/Third Pole Environment Data Center, available in English; LEV (Kyzivat et al., 2021) from the Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC); HR lakes (Kyzivat et al., 2019a; Mullen et al., 2022; Muster et al., 2017a) from ORNL DAAC, ORNL DAAC, and PANGEA, respectively; and ERA5 (Muñoz Sabater, 2019) from Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store. New data and a python toolbox generated for this manuscript are archived in the Arctic Data Center (Kyzivat & Smith, 2023).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following publicly‐available data sets were used in this analysis: HydroLAKES (Messager et al., 2016) from the World Wildlife Fund; GSW (Pekel et al., 2016) from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre; BAWLD (Olefeldt et al., 2021a) and BAWLD‐CH4 (Kuhn et al., 2021a) from the National Science Foundation Arctic Data Center; WBD (Feng & Sui, 2020) from the Chinese National Tibetan Plateau/Third Pole Environment Data Center, available in English; LEV (Kyzivat et al., 2021) from the Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC); HR lakes (Kyzivat et al., 2019a; Mullen et al., 2022; Muster et al., 2017a) from ORNL DAAC, ORNL DAAC, and PANGEA, respectively; and ERA5 (Muñoz Sabater, 2019) from Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store. New data and a python toolbox generated for this manuscript are archived in the Arctic Data Center (Kyzivat & Smith, 2023).…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%