2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of large-tree retention for the persistence of old-growth epiphytic bryophyte Neckera pennata in selection harvest systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is precisely among those indicator species for the oldest trees that we find the highest frequency of Macaronesian endemic species as well as red‐listed species considered as Vulnerable ( Cololejeunea schaeferi, Echinodium spinosum, Leptodon longisetus ) and Near‐Threatened ( Andoa berthelotiana, Exsertotheca intermedia, Frullania polysticta, Isothecium algarvicum, I. prolixum, Leucobryum albidum, Plagiothecium nemorale, Tetrastichium fontanum ) in Madeira (Sim‐Sim et al., ). Old trees, even if located in historically harvested forest remnants, exhibit rich epiphyte communities provided that they are located in climatically suitable areas (Edman, Eriksson, & Villard, ; Lindenmayer & Laurance, ). Since, in Madeira, even the oldest forest stands such as Folhadal show signs of historical harvesting dating back to about 150 years ago, so that actual ancient forest stands may not exist in the archipelago, the conservation of clusters of late‐successional (broadleaved) trees, enhancing connectivity at such small spatial scales as tens of metres, is of utmost importance for the conservation of the unique laurel forest epiphytic flora of Madeira.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is precisely among those indicator species for the oldest trees that we find the highest frequency of Macaronesian endemic species as well as red‐listed species considered as Vulnerable ( Cololejeunea schaeferi, Echinodium spinosum, Leptodon longisetus ) and Near‐Threatened ( Andoa berthelotiana, Exsertotheca intermedia, Frullania polysticta, Isothecium algarvicum, I. prolixum, Leucobryum albidum, Plagiothecium nemorale, Tetrastichium fontanum ) in Madeira (Sim‐Sim et al., ). Old trees, even if located in historically harvested forest remnants, exhibit rich epiphyte communities provided that they are located in climatically suitable areas (Edman, Eriksson, & Villard, ; Lindenmayer & Laurance, ). Since, in Madeira, even the oldest forest stands such as Folhadal show signs of historical harvesting dating back to about 150 years ago, so that actual ancient forest stands may not exist in the archipelago, the conservation of clusters of late‐successional (broadleaved) trees, enhancing connectivity at such small spatial scales as tens of metres, is of utmost importance for the conservation of the unique laurel forest epiphytic flora of Madeira.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each species with an ISA >0.10, the ISA value and its significance level (* <0.05, ** <0.01, *** <0.001) are indicated. | 1735 exhibit rich epiphyte communities provided that they are located in climatically suitable areas (Edman, Eriksson, & Villard, 2016;Lindenmayer & Laurance, 2017). Since, in Madeira, even the oldest forest stands such as Folhadal show signs of historical harvesting dating back to about 150 years ago, so that actual ancient forest stands may not exist in the archipelago, the conservation of clusters of late-successional (broadleaved) trees, enhancing connectivity at such small spatial scales as tens of metres, is of utmost importance for the conservation of the unique laurel forest epiphytic flora of Madeira.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it might be due to a higher opportunity of D. viride to avoid competition with dominant humo‐corticolous epiphyte species by settling higher on the trunk (Bardat and Hugonnot 2002). Overall, sylvicultural practices aimed at maximizing the presence of large deciduous trees within stands – such as extending harvest rotation period or retaining large trees during clear‐cutting, seem to be relevant approaches, as has already been suggested for bryophytes (Edman et al 2016) or lichens (Sillett et al 2000, Nascimbene et al 2007). At stand scale, we showed that colonization probability decreases rapidly in the immediate surroundings of each source population (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Large DBH implies that trees are old enough to have provided a longer time for colonization by more epiphytic bryophyte species [72]. In addition, the moisture content of the bark may increase with increasing DBH [10], which is also conducive to the growth of epiphytic bryophytes. Another positive factor on recruitment count for species richness was LAI.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Epiphytic Bryophyte Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonization and subsequent development of epiphytic bryophyte diversity are regulated by factors at the tree, stand, and global scales [7,8]. At the tree level, many studies have emphasized that the total tree height (H) [9], diameter at breast height (DBH) [10], canopy openness [11], age [12], and bark characteristics [13] are the driving factors of the diversity of epiphytic bryophytes. At the stand level, diversified microhabitats drive the development of epiphyte diversity that results from stand characteristics such as tree species composition [14], the continuity of the forest area [15], forest age [16], and tree density [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%