2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-013-0350-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of reciprocal spillover effects for the valuation of bestseller brands: introducing and testing a contingency model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a limitation of that study is that the author did not consider the possible spillover effect on the parent brand that could lead to dilution. In contrast, a stream of research has investigated the extent to which an extension affects the equity of the parent brand (Keller & Sood, ), where one tactic in extending a brand is to avoid ‘‘diluting’’ the parent brand's equity, which can lead to negative effects (Boisvert, ; Keller & Sood, ; Knapp, Hennig‐Thurau, & Mathys, ; Milberg et al., ; Ng, ). This is particularly true when the extension's associations are considered inconsistent with the parent brand's meaning and primary equity (Milberg et al., ; Pullig, Simmons, & Netemeyer, ; Roedder John, Loken, & Joiner, ).…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a limitation of that study is that the author did not consider the possible spillover effect on the parent brand that could lead to dilution. In contrast, a stream of research has investigated the extent to which an extension affects the equity of the parent brand (Keller & Sood, ), where one tactic in extending a brand is to avoid ‘‘diluting’’ the parent brand's equity, which can lead to negative effects (Boisvert, ; Keller & Sood, ; Knapp, Hennig‐Thurau, & Mathys, ; Milberg et al., ; Ng, ). This is particularly true when the extension's associations are considered inconsistent with the parent brand's meaning and primary equity (Milberg et al., ; Pullig, Simmons, & Netemeyer, ; Roedder John, Loken, & Joiner, ).…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market leaders outsell market followers and have the largest percentage of market share in the corresponding industries (Hoeffler and Keller 2003). We empirically explore the moderation effect of market position, rather than formulating hypotheses, as double jeopardy theory (e.g., Ehrenberg et al 1990) and information accessibility theory (Feldman and Lynch 1988;Knapp et al 2014) propose opposite moderation effects of market position. The former proposes that CEDs are less important for market leaders, and the latter proposes that they are more important.…”
Section: Firm Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory argues that the ability to access information is crucial for customers as input to judgment and decisions (Feldman and Lynch 1988;Knapp et al 2014). One advantage of being a market leader is that customers tend to have more knowledge of market leaders than followers (Hoeffler and Keller 2003).…”
Section: Firm Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the accessibility-diagnosticity framework (Feldman and Lynch 1988;Lynch et al 1988), consumers rely on the cues that are more diagnostic and accessible to make a judgment (Joshi and Mao 2012;Knapp et al 2014;Langan et al 2017). We use conceptual arguments based on this accessibility-diagnosticity framework to predict and establish which of the cues associated with star brand equity and product reviews are more likely to drive consumer choice and BO performance.…”
Section: Accessibility-diagnosticitymentioning
confidence: 99%