2012
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812466534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Importance of the Number of Reflux Episodes in the Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Abstract: Our study demonstrates the importance of the absolute number of laryngopharyngeal reflux episodes in 24 hours in the diagnosis of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux, proposing it as a new diagnostic criterion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we were able to record the pH data for about 6 hours before subjects went to sleep, so we could investigate reflux patterns in different periods. Third, although some studies used the criteria of conventional oesophageal pH monitoring to diagnose reflux diseases, there is still no gold standard of Dx‐pH to diagnose LPR. For example, the 95th percentile for the number of events below pH 5.0 in normal individuals was 8.1 in the study by Sun et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we were able to record the pH data for about 6 hours before subjects went to sleep, so we could investigate reflux patterns in different periods. Third, although some studies used the criteria of conventional oesophageal pH monitoring to diagnose reflux diseases, there is still no gold standard of Dx‐pH to diagnose LPR. For example, the 95th percentile for the number of events below pH 5.0 in normal individuals was 8.1 in the study by Sun et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 In our study, we were able to record the pH data for about 6 hours before subjects went to sleep, so we could investigate reflux patterns in different periods. Third, although some studies used the criteria of conventional oesophageal pH monitoring to diagnose reflux diseases, [32][33][34] there is still no gold standard of Dx-pH to diagnose LPR. For example, the 95th percentile for the number of events below pH 5.0 in normal individuals was 8.1 in the study by Sun et al 22 but it was 10.7 in the study by Chheda et al 23 Therefore, we used the Dx-pH oropharyngeal probe to compare the reflux events and pH values without determining how many patients were diagnosed as having LPR in different groups.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study evaluated the results of 30 patients who experienced at least one reflux attack at the proximal probe of the pH-meter and were treated. [9] The youngest of these patients was 24 years of age and the oldest was 62.…”
Section: Patients Who Admitted To Taksim Training and Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To date, the most commonly used diagnostic test for LFR detection remains ambulatory 24-hour dual-probe pH monitoring. [9] Smit et al, in 1998, described a relatively easy and reliable technique for the placement of the proximal probe. [10] This method has been used in our study.…”
Section: Patients Who Admitted To Taksim Training and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation