The Importance of the Social Sciences in Reducing Tail Biting Prevalence in Pigs

Abstract

Simple SummaryTail lesions are a major welfare concern within pig farming. Tail lesions result from biting and chewing of the tail of one pig by another and can indicate boredom and frustration within the herd. While extensive research has been carried out to understand and eliminate tail biting in pigs, findings from scientific studies have often not been applied in practice. This may be due, in part, to a failure to consider the role of farmer behaviour in improving animal welfare. If farmer behaviour does not change, it is unlikely that tail lesion prevalence will change from current levels. In this paper, the shortcomings of traditional behaviour change theories were discussed and a guide for designing human behaviour change interventions for pig farmers was provided. It is essential that collaborations between social scientists and animal welfare scientists occur if research findings are to be put into practice on farms.AbstractTail biting in pigs has been recognised as a welfare problem for several decades, being referred to in scientific literature as far back as the 1940s. Today, animal welfare scientists have a solid understanding of the aetiology of tail biting. Despite this, there has been a major failure in applying research findings on commercial farms. Consequently, tail biting remains a significant problem in modern intensive pig farming. Of all farming industry stakeholders, farmers have the greatest influence over the welfare of their animals. Despite this, little animal welfare research has focused on changing farmer behaviour. Understanding the reasons why farmers act or fail to act to improve animal welfare is key if research findings are to be translated into practical on-farm change. Adopting the principles of behavioural science, this review discussed theory-based methods of identifying barriers to effective tail biting management. A guide was provided for designing behaviour change interventions for farmers using The Behaviour Change Wheel, a systematic framework that links the source of behaviour to suitable interventions. It was concluded that the social sciences are of great importance to ensuring that theory is put into practice.

The Importance of Social Norm on Adopting Sustainable Digital Fertilisation Methods

“…Fifth, we focus on factors derived from the RAA and define social reference groups rather narrowly. This leaves room to tackle the societal dimension of perceived norms and take into account the societal pressure to improve the sustainability of land management that farmers increasingly face with current production systems, which likely influences adoption behaviour (Carroll & Groarke, 2019). Given that land and its use contribute to public goods such as landscape, eco-system services and groundwater, free-rider behaviour might be another issue.…”

“…Thereby, a growing strand of literature emphasizes the role of information and knowledge generation (e.g., Smith et al, 2018), as well as social norms (Burton, 2004; Kuhfuss et al, 2016; Le Coent et al, 2019) for farmers’ adoption of pro-environmental behaviour, including the adoption of digital technologies. Recent reviews, however, have agreed that the role of social norms as a behavioural driver is thus far underresearched (Carroll & Groarke, 2019; Chabé-Ferret et al, 2019; Dessart et al, 2019; Palm-Forster et al, 2019), and clear causal interpretations of widely used demographic factors to explain behavioural patterns are lacking (e.g., Burton, 2014). We aim to help close this gap, and argue that overcoming adoption barriers for sustainable farming technologies requires understanding the influence of social norms on farmers’ behaviour.…”

Herd health and production management visits on Canadian dairy cattle farms: Structure, goals, and topics discussed

“…However, the use of a codebook and discussions between coders resulted in an interrater agreement that was deemed acceptable. Because study participants were aware of being recorded, there is a risk of the Hawthorne effect (i.e., participants changing behavior when knowing that they are observed; Carroll and Groarke, 2019). In particular, participants could have avoided certain topics that they felt were personal or portrayed the farm in a negative light (e.g., farm finances, lameness).…”

Cattle farmer psychosocial profiles and their association with control strategies for bovine viral diarrhea

“…The undertaking of any given behavior is influenced by a person having sufficient capability (e.g., physical ability, knowledge, and understanding), opportunity (e.g., physical resources and support from others), and motivation (e.g., both reflective decision making and automatic habits and emotions; Michie et al, 2011 , 2014 ). The capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior ( COM-B ) framework of behavior change captures these interrelated attributes, encompasses existing frameworks for behavior in health settings, and has been applied to farmer and veterinary behavior ( Michie et al, 2011 ; Hardefeldt et al, 2018 ; Carroll and Groarke, 2019 ). The COM-B framework has traditionally been used to study predictors of individual behavior change.…”