2017
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.679.12507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of validated alpha taxonomy for phylogenetic and DNA barcoding studies: a comment on species identification of pygmy grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae)

Abstract: In a recently published paper on colour polymorphism in a Pygmy grasshopper from China (Zhao et al 2016) an unidentified Paratettix sp. was misidentified as Tetrix bolivari. This case highlights the need for correct species identification and provides an opportunity to recommend some aspects of Good Taxonomic Practice (GTP) in Tetrigidae to reduce the number of erroneous identifications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high number of taxonomists required to avoid any error in morphological identification of species should not be an impediment of large-scale DNA barcoding campaigns [72], especially in a period of risk for biodiversity that calls for a rapid assessment of species identification. On the other hand, this should not coincide with the risk of large but low-quality data production, thus it is fundamental maintaining a standard that allows a posteriori verification of identifications via morphological analysis [21,[73][74][75]. In this regard we proved the efficacy of a non-invasive DNA extraction protocol that allows successful amplification of the barcoding gene fragment in flea beetle specimens as small as 1.5 mm.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 88%
“…The high number of taxonomists required to avoid any error in morphological identification of species should not be an impediment of large-scale DNA barcoding campaigns [72], especially in a period of risk for biodiversity that calls for a rapid assessment of species identification. On the other hand, this should not coincide with the risk of large but low-quality data production, thus it is fundamental maintaining a standard that allows a posteriori verification of identifications via morphological analysis [21,[73][74][75]. In this regard we proved the efficacy of a non-invasive DNA extraction protocol that allows successful amplification of the barcoding gene fragment in flea beetle specimens as small as 1.5 mm.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Millimeter paper was placed close to the photographed specimen and subsequently used to construct a scale bar, included in the photograph, after which the millimeter paper was deleted. The morphological terminology and measurement methods follow Tumbrinck (2014a) and good taxonomic practice suggested in Lehmann et al (2017). For many localities, the geographical coordinates were identified as accurately as possible by localization of the place found on the labels with different gazetteers and extracted using the Google Earth program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First segment of the hind tarsus not longer than the third, pulvilli acute, in three species with apical teeth (L. sagittatus, L. signatus, L. karwinkeli). The coloration is highly variable and not a useful feature for either generic or specific diagnosis (as reported for Tetriginae in Lehmann et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, alpha-taxonomy is important, as it forms the basis for studying other biological relationships as well as all aspects of a taxon's biology (Lehmann et al 2017), and an accurate taxonomy is also important for determining a species' conservation status and is critical for conservation planning (Peterson 2006). Although providing effective camouflage, this uniform coloration has complicated the circumscription of species when based solely or predominantly on external morphology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although providing effective camouflage, this uniform coloration has complicated the circumscription of species when based solely or predominantly on external morphology. However, alpha-taxonomy is important, as it forms the basis for studying other biological relationships as well as all aspects of a taxon's biology (Lehmann et al 2017), and an accurate taxonomy is also important for determining a species' conservation status and is critical for conservation planning (Peterson 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%