2016
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.2938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The important elements of LMS design that affect user engagement with e-learning tools within LMSs in the higher education sector

Abstract: <p class="abstract"><span lang="EN-US">In recent years, universities have been under increased pressure to adopt e-learning practices for teaching and learning. In particular, the emphasis has been on learning management systems (LMSs) and associated collaboration tools to provide opportunities for sharing knowledge, building a community of learners, and supporting higher order learning and critical thinking through conversation and collaboration. Due to the greater level of</span><span la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In online courses, as in any academic work, students' active engagement affects their learning outcomes, cognitive development, and educational quality (Soffer & Nachmias, 2018;Hew, 2016;Smith, Sheppard, Johnson, & Johnson, 2005;). Previous studies discuss various aspects of engagement, for example, the effect of LMS design factors on user engagement (Zanjani, Edwards, Nykvist, & Geva, 2017); the influence of personal aspects on student engagement (Jung & Lee, 2018;Pellas, 2014); and instructor scaffolding for interaction (Cho & Cho, 2014). Yet hardly any have looked directly at the impact of the course's pedagogical model on engagement (Khan, Egbue, Palkie, & Madden, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In online courses, as in any academic work, students' active engagement affects their learning outcomes, cognitive development, and educational quality (Soffer & Nachmias, 2018;Hew, 2016;Smith, Sheppard, Johnson, & Johnson, 2005;). Previous studies discuss various aspects of engagement, for example, the effect of LMS design factors on user engagement (Zanjani, Edwards, Nykvist, & Geva, 2017); the influence of personal aspects on student engagement (Jung & Lee, 2018;Pellas, 2014); and instructor scaffolding for interaction (Cho & Cho, 2014). Yet hardly any have looked directly at the impact of the course's pedagogical model on engagement (Khan, Egbue, Palkie, & Madden, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bocevska et al (2018) defined a personalized learning method as a part of LMS improvement that refers to a variety of learning experiences, approaches and strategies for addressing various learning needs, aspirations, interest and backgrounds of individual learners, through the use of data generated by the learners' activities. Whereas Zanjani et al (2017) investigated the LMS design determinants that impact user engagement with LMS tools in higher education. Valsamidis et al (2012) also investigated the design of LMS for improving provisions through data mining techniques and therefore proposed specific metrics for the assessment of the courses.…”
Section: Aim and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LMS and the internet provides a selection of technologies to enhance learning like collaboration tools, discussion groups, wikis, videos, slides, simulations, online assessments, email, live chat etc. Incorporating too many tools into a course can cause a "technology overload" meaning that the course becomes overwhelming for a user, resulting in them avoiding many tasks altogether [17]. Selecting the right tool for the task involves many factors.…”
Section: E-learning Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] maintains that short tasks that have clearly defined outcomes and require the use of easy-to-use technology is a more favored approach for users. [17] adds that perceived ease of use encourages students to continue using the technology but cautions instructors against the technology overload that results from too many or too complex technologically enhanced tasks. Technology overload is subjective depending on the student's E-skills level capability.…”
Section: E-learning Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation