2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0997-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The improvement of a regional climate model by coupling a land surface model with eco-physiological processes: A case study in 1998

Abstract: The Atmospheric-Vegetation Interaction Model (AVIM) is coupled with a Regional Integrated Environment Modeling System (RIEMS) to improve the regional simulation of climate variables. A case study in 1998 is implemented to study the improvement mechanism through land-air interaction in East Asia, especially in Asian summer monsoon regions. The coupled model reduces the warming bias in July in East China through the surface heat fluxes changes. Compared to the original model of RIEMS, the strong precipitation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the LUE models, Global Production Efficiency Model (GloPEM) introduced the largest uncertainty, as it had two extremely large values (Figure ), which might have arisen from the biased driving data from remote sensing [ Dan et al ., ]. When the driving climate data were corrected further, the GloPEM's output was close to the average of these models [ Dan et al ., ]. For the NBP from the MsTMIP data, the majority of the overall uncertainty was caused by the dramatic difference between TRIPLEX‐GHG and other models (1.10 versus 0.15 Pg C yr −1 ; Figure ), which mainly came from the much lower heterotrophic respiration (Rh) in TRIPLEX‐GHG (1.83 versus 3.07 Pg C yr −1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the LUE models, Global Production Efficiency Model (GloPEM) introduced the largest uncertainty, as it had two extremely large values (Figure ), which might have arisen from the biased driving data from remote sensing [ Dan et al ., ]. When the driving climate data were corrected further, the GloPEM's output was close to the average of these models [ Dan et al ., ]. For the NBP from the MsTMIP data, the majority of the overall uncertainty was caused by the dramatic difference between TRIPLEX‐GHG and other models (1.10 versus 0.15 Pg C yr −1 ; Figure ), which mainly came from the much lower heterotrophic respiration (Rh) in TRIPLEX‐GHG (1.83 versus 3.07 Pg C yr −1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of these processes and the related parameters are given in the aforementioned references (Dan et al, , ; Lu & Ji, ). The model's ability to simulate the heat, water, and carbon fluxes in different ecosystems has been studied comprehensively (Dan et al, , , ). This model was part of the Ecosystem Model Data Intercomparison, and simulations agree well with the observed data (Dan et al, ).…”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon cycle is source of uncertainty in climate simulation and projection models (IPCC 2013). It is therefore important to quantify accurately the magnitude and variation of carbon fluxes in regions with a complex climate and topography, such as China, which is affected by strong interactions between ecosystems and the monsoon climate (Fu et al 2002;Dan, Cao, and Gao 2015). However, it is difficult to reproduce accurately the flux of carbon and nitrogen in China as a result of a lack of global-and regional-scale observations of the nitrogen cycle and the complex climate-vegetation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%