2018
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2017.2743073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The In-Op Design of Electrical Distribution Systems Based on Microsystem Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…responsibility to include the "installation approach" and the "operating approach" as power system eco-design criteria. The installation-operation (In-Op) design in [9] considers the load when selecting the P B rating of components as well as the parts' lifespan. It is well known that the load diagram of the absorbed power P(t) varies in the operating time t op (with a cycle measured in minutes, a day as 24 h, and a year as 8,760 h), and the integration of P(t) in the t op calculates the consumed energy E. Therefore, it is possible to evaluate the average power P M = E/t op and duration of utilization h u = E/P B of the P B maximum value.…”
Section: Right To a Sustainable "Genetic Code" In Electrical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…responsibility to include the "installation approach" and the "operating approach" as power system eco-design criteria. The installation-operation (In-Op) design in [9] considers the load when selecting the P B rating of components as well as the parts' lifespan. It is well known that the load diagram of the absorbed power P(t) varies in the operating time t op (with a cycle measured in minutes, a day as 24 h, and a year as 8,760 h), and the integration of P(t) in the t op calculates the consumed energy E. Therefore, it is possible to evaluate the average power P M = E/t op and duration of utilization h u = E/P B of the P B maximum value.…”
Section: Right To a Sustainable "Genetic Code" In Electrical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the load diagram of the absorbed power P(t) varies in the operating time t op (with a cycle measured in minutes, a day as 24 h, and a year as 8,760 h), and the integration of P(t) in the t op calculates the consumed energy E. Therefore, it is possible to evaluate the average power P M = E/t op and duration of utilization h u = E/P B of the P B maximum value. A parameter characteristic of the In-Op design is the ratio h u /t op = P M /P B between the mean value P M of the operating power and the P B value of the design power [9]. The design power P B governs components' prospective rating, but the mean power P M is the reference to evaluate the system's actual energy operation.…”
Section: Right To a Sustainable "Genetic Code" In Electrical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of the Six Sigma method based on DMAIC in improving the fracture resistance of small and medium TFT liquid crystal displays in Literature [20]. Giuseppe Parise explores an innovative design strategy for building power systems by introducing standards based on the ''installation method'' and ''operation method'' and applying the PDCA cycle [21]. The DMAIC method is a process improvement method consisting of five stages: Define, Measure, Analysis, Improve, and Control.…”
Section: E Cosine Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability differs from reliability, as it admits that the system components may suffer failure, but that the system is still available at the time or in the period in which its use is required. A CAS topology must allow operational performance by design for the service continuity such as fault selectivity, immunity from interference between different areas of the system, the easy maintenance of the system on its parts, the flexibility and the expandability (In-Op approach) [1]. The topology to be fault tolerant requires a backbone appropriate to the type of loads area with system sections that have active partitions supplied by different sources (Figure 2 UPS A-B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%