2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The in vivo fate of polymeric micelles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 397 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical micelle concentration (CMC), which reflects the physical stability to maintain the micelle structure, was determined by a fluorescence method. The CMCs of Pep-SSetc-CPT and Pep-SSetc-CPT@Phen micelles were 0.62 and 0.49 mg/L, respectively (Figure a,b), which are only about 1/10 of values for most nanodrugs, indicating that both micelles are very stable against dilution. Moreover, both Pep-SSetc-CPT and Pep-SSetc-CPT@Phen in the 50% FBS solution were also highly resistant to nonspecific protein adsorption since the deviation of both sizes and PDI is minor after incubation (Figure c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The critical micelle concentration (CMC), which reflects the physical stability to maintain the micelle structure, was determined by a fluorescence method. The CMCs of Pep-SSetc-CPT and Pep-SSetc-CPT@Phen micelles were 0.62 and 0.49 mg/L, respectively (Figure a,b), which are only about 1/10 of values for most nanodrugs, indicating that both micelles are very stable against dilution. Moreover, both Pep-SSetc-CPT and Pep-SSetc-CPT@Phen in the 50% FBS solution were also highly resistant to nonspecific protein adsorption since the deviation of both sizes and PDI is minor after incubation (Figure c,d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The zeta potential of nanoparticles has a major impact on their biological effects in vitro and in vivo . 38–41 We examined the zeta potential of NEs and found no difference among these nanoparticles; therefore we ruled out the effects of potentials on the biodistribution of NEs (Fig. 2e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zeta potential of nanoparticles has a major impact on their biological effects in vitro and in vivo. [38][39][40][41] We examined the zeta potential of NEs and found no difference among these…”
Section: Preparation and Characterization Of Nesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is an urgent need for a reliable bioimaging tool for holistic identification and accurate detection of NC to facilitate the clinical translation of NC-loaded DMNs. Second, current studies [ 26 , 28 , 41 ] on the in vivo fate of NC have focused more on the delivery system itself, ignoring the influence of the complex biological environment. The skin is the largest organ of the body, and the sites of DMNs application may affect the in vivo fate of NC-loaded DMNs, mainly because at different skin sites: (1) Different thicknesses of the epidermis and dermis meant that the area where the needle tips enter the dermis after insertion of DMNs was different; (2) Different classes of cells and matrices in the dermal region implied different interactions with NC; (3) Different mechanical strength meant different shear forces on the DMNs [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%