2019
DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incidence and Nature of Allergic and Anaphylactic Reactions During Pediatric Procedural Sedation: A Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium

Abstract: A B S T R A C TBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anaphylaxis is rare but life-threatening. Its incidence during pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room is unknown. We used data from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium (PSRC) to determine the incidence and nature of allergic and anaphylactic reactions in this practice. METHODS:A retrospective observational study of prospectively collected information in the PSRC's multicenter database was performed. Cases of allergic reaction were identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in connection with a buccal administration of midazolam, a grade 2 anaphylactic reaction had to be treated after a seizure, which did not result in further injury or require intensive medical treatment. This side effect has been published repeatedly ( 27 , 28 ) and is considered as a rare complication of midazolam ( 29 ). Our experience appears to be consistent with the limited data available in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, in connection with a buccal administration of midazolam, a grade 2 anaphylactic reaction had to be treated after a seizure, which did not result in further injury or require intensive medical treatment. This side effect has been published repeatedly ( 27 , 28 ) and is considered as a rare complication of midazolam ( 29 ). Our experience appears to be consistent with the limited data available in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Another important difference is that antibiotics were conspicuously absent as potential culprit agents for anaphylaxis in this study. Upon close scrutiny, it is understandable that this was not a specific finding given the founding purpose of this database to include cases for imaging and procedural sedation in off‐sites locations, where these medications would not be frequently used 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent retrospective analysis, allergic reactions due to sedative e/o analgesic medications during pediatric preprocedural sedation were described with an incidence of about 1:4,219, with midazolam being the third most frequently reported drug (1:2,035) (30). Midazolam can also be associated with severe adverse events, for example, anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%