1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00026-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incidence of breast cancer following mantle field radiation therapy as a function of dose and technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The few other studies that have investigated the relation of risk to dosage have not calculated doses specifically to the part of the breast in which the cancer occurred. Two studies found evidence of a dose -response relation (Bhatia et al, 1996b;Tinger et al, 1997) while one did not (Hancock et al, 1993), although the great majority of person-years in the latter study were in one dose category. There are inaccuracies in retrospective dose allocations in such studies because radiotherapy causes breast shrinkage, leading to changes in breast shape of treated women over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The few other studies that have investigated the relation of risk to dosage have not calculated doses specifically to the part of the breast in which the cancer occurred. Two studies found evidence of a dose -response relation (Bhatia et al, 1996b;Tinger et al, 1997) while one did not (Hancock et al, 1993), although the great majority of person-years in the latter study were in one dose category. There are inaccuracies in retrospective dose allocations in such studies because radiotherapy causes breast shrinkage, leading to changes in breast shape of treated women over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The benign biopsy rates in the two prospective screening studies that reported this parameter were 3.8 and 6.1%, respectively (Diller et al, 2002;NHSBSP, 2007;Kwong et al, 2008). The risk of developing BC after treatment for HL is related to both SRT dose and field (Tinger et al, 1997;Hill et al, 2005). In our cohort, the increased SRT dose received by BC cases was primarily a reflection of the increased incidence of a mantle field rather than an independent effect of dose on BC development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, the NRASP strategy seems to be capable of detecting BC at an early clinical stage, whereas the range of immunophenotypes suggests that these tumours are not of a universally good prognosis. Although new radiotherapy techniques and treatment strategies have the potential to reduce the future burden of late effects, the population of women reviewed in the NRASP has a mean age approaching that at which BC was diagnosed in the 23 affected women, suggesting that there remains a significant cohort at an increased risk of BC (and other malignancies) in whom continued vigilance is required (Tinger et al, 1997;Hodgson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Techniques of radiation applied in the past, the socalled "mantle field" and especially the mandatory irradiation of axillary lymph nodes, are associated with an increased risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer due to the lack of full protection of the mammary parenchyma. 14,15 Several studies have demonstrated a high incidence of bilateral breast carcinomas (21%) after radiotherapy of lymph chains above the diaphragm. 16,17 No correlation has been established between the dose of fractionation and the risk of development of secondary breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%