2006
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2005.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incidence of Factor VIII and Factor IX Inhibitors in the Hemophilia Population of the UK and Their Effect on Subsequent Mortality, 1977–99*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
177
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
177
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality associated with the development of inhibitors has change through years, in severe haemophiliacs without HIV, inhibitor development doubled mortality during 1977-1992 in the UK, but during 1993-1999 mortality was identical with and without inhibitors. In severe haemophiliacs without HIV but with inhibitors, mortality from causes involving bleeding decreased during 1977-1999 (P = 0.001) as did mortality involving intracranial haemorrhage (P = 0.007), these results do not appear to be related with the type of treatment for haemophilia or the treatment for the inhibitors [38].…”
Section: Summary Of Findings On Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mortality associated with the development of inhibitors has change through years, in severe haemophiliacs without HIV, inhibitor development doubled mortality during 1977-1992 in the UK, but during 1993-1999 mortality was identical with and without inhibitors. In severe haemophiliacs without HIV but with inhibitors, mortality from causes involving bleeding decreased during 1977-1999 (P = 0.001) as did mortality involving intracranial haemorrhage (P = 0.007), these results do not appear to be related with the type of treatment for haemophilia or the treatment for the inhibitors [38].…”
Section: Summary Of Findings On Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several reports have suggested an increased incidence of clinically significant intracranial hemorrhage and worse outcomes for patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. [24][25][26][27][28][29] Our study was not powered to detect the benefit of prophylaxis for low-incidence, high-morbidity bleeding events such as intracranial hemorrhage. However, it is reasonable to assume that patients who have a good response to prophylaxis are also likely to have a reduced risk of life-threatening bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also generally accepted that inhibitor screening should occur before invasive procedures and at regular intervals during the initial 50 treatment days as this is the highest risk period for inhibitor development. 1 After a patient has received factor for 150 treatment days, the rate of inhibitor development is substantially reduced. 3 Although rates of detection are low with routine surveillance in those with greater than 150 treatment days, we recommend annual testing to facilitate postmarketing surveillance by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Universal Data Collection (UDC) Project and other national surveillance programs.…”
Section: How Are Inhibitors Detected?mentioning
confidence: 99%