2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01403-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incidence of skin melanoma in Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain) is lower than expected in Southern Europe despite high-risk environmental conditions: an island-wide cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, this study relies on the assumption that all incident skin melanoma cases diagnosed in Gran Canaria residents in the study period were considered. Because of how the dataset was elaborated, we have certainty that all cases diagnosed in the public healthcare system (CIHS) were included, but a few cases diagnosed in private practices might have been missed [ 13 ]. The CIHS covers about 87% of all healthcare in the region, and cases diagnosed in private clinics in our dataset represented 15.8%, that is, more than expected [ 13 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, this study relies on the assumption that all incident skin melanoma cases diagnosed in Gran Canaria residents in the study period were considered. Because of how the dataset was elaborated, we have certainty that all cases diagnosed in the public healthcare system (CIHS) were included, but a few cases diagnosed in private practices might have been missed [ 13 ]. The CIHS covers about 87% of all healthcare in the region, and cases diagnosed in private clinics in our dataset represented 15.8%, that is, more than expected [ 13 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of how the dataset was elaborated, we have certainty that all cases diagnosed in the public healthcare system (CIHS) were included, but a few cases diagnosed in private practices might have been missed [ 13 ]. The CIHS covers about 87% of all healthcare in the region, and cases diagnosed in private clinics in our dataset represented 15.8%, that is, more than expected [ 13 , 15 ]. Therefore, the plausible number of missing cases is unlikely to have meaningfully biased the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations