2015
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incidence of unexplained visual loss following removal of silicone oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
68
1
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
68
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we analyzed 554 consecutive SO removal operations over 2 years at 1 tertiary referral vitreoretinal center (Magrabi Eye Hospital, Tanta, Egypt) and found 12 cases of unexplained visual loss. This suggests an overall incidence of 2.2% of unexplained visual loss, which is close to the results of Moya et al [10] , who reported a 3.3% overall incidence of visual loss following SO removal, while Herbert et al [11] documented that the condition has been estimated to occur in up to 10% of SO-filled eyes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we analyzed 554 consecutive SO removal operations over 2 years at 1 tertiary referral vitreoretinal center (Magrabi Eye Hospital, Tanta, Egypt) and found 12 cases of unexplained visual loss. This suggests an overall incidence of 2.2% of unexplained visual loss, which is close to the results of Moya et al [10] , who reported a 3.3% overall incidence of visual loss following SO removal, while Herbert et al [11] documented that the condition has been estimated to occur in up to 10% of SO-filled eyes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Herbert et al [11] reported that 5 patients had developed central visual loss with SO in situ in a retrospective study; the oil was in place for an average of 2.7 months when the scotomas arose, and were associated with decreased visual acuity and visual field defects. In contrast, Moya et al [10] reported 14 patients with reduction of visual acuity after SO removal.…”
Section: Color Version Available Onlinementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The mechanism of how SO endotamponade causes retinal thinning remains unclear. Previous studies have shown the migration of SO into the ocular tissues, including the optic nerve, and the subsequent induction of an inflammatory response mediated by macrophages in several human and animal studies [12][13][14][15][29][30][31][32] ; however, retinal thinning occurs not only in severe cases but also in mildto-moderate cases; thus, it is difficult to conclude that SO intraretinal infiltration is the only cause for the retinal thinning. There have also been reports on the changes in visual outcome and retinal thickness caused by treatment with SO endotamponade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…SO is used with expectancy for intraocular tamponade and retinal reconstruction to prevent recurrence. Nevertheless, various complications, such as cataract, glaucoma, and corneal diseases, have been reportedly involved in the use of SO [11][12][13] . Among them, visual loss presumably caused by the SO endotamponade treatment, without an apparent reason, has been reported [14][15][16] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No influence of the tamponade on the occurrence of re-detachment was found. This suggests that in our practice, the focus has to be put on further reduction of SO tamponade in future cases to reduce possible complications and the need of a second procedure (SO removal) [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%