2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2945095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inclination Angle and Mass of the Black Hole in XTE J1118+480

Abstract: We have obtained optical and infrared photometry of the quiescent soft Xray transient XTE J1118+480. In addition to optical and J-band variations, we present the first observed H-and K s -band ellipsoidal variations for this system. We model the variations in all bands simultaneously with the WD98 light curve modeling code. The infrared colors of the secondary star in this system are consistent with a K7V, while there is evidence for light from the accretion disk in the optical. Combining the models with the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(35) for EOSs previously cited as supporting masses greater than about 1.6 M is reasonably tight. This relation may be inverted to yield a radius estimate given I and M. Furthermore, since I ∝ R 2 , the inferred relative error of R using this procedure would be approximately half the relative measured error of I itself.…”
Section: Moments Of Inertiamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…(35) for EOSs previously cited as supporting masses greater than about 1.6 M is reasonably tight. This relation may be inverted to yield a radius estimate given I and M. Furthermore, since I ∝ R 2 , the inferred relative error of R using this procedure would be approximately half the relative measured error of I itself.…”
Section: Moments Of Inertiamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1), we included 55 NSs with error bars varying between 0.009 and 0.548 M ⊙ in our work. The full references to the original works, including the label letter employed in the compilation are given in the reference list (van Kerkwijck, van Paradijs & Zuiderwijck 1995; Barziv et al 2001; Lange et al 2001; Nice, Splaver & Stairs 2001, 2003, 2004; Stairs et al 2002; Freire et al 2003, 2008b; Gelino, Tomsick & Heindl 2003; Jonker, van der Klis & Groot 2003; Quaintrell et al 2003; Corongiu et al 2004; Podsiadlowski et al 2004; Champion et al 2005; Ransom et al 2005; Splaver et al 2005; Weisberg & Taylor 2005; Bassa et al 2006; Hotan, Bailes & Ord 2006; Jacoby et al 2006; Kramer et al 2006; Lorimer et al 2006; Freire, Ransom & Gupta 2007; Steeghs & Jonker 2007; Bhat, Bailes & Verbiest 2008; Ferdman 2008; Freire, Jacoby & Bailes 2008a; Janssen et al 2008; Nice, Stairs & Kasian 2008; Verbiest et al 2008; Freire 2009; Casares et al 2010; Mason et al 2010). The uncertainties for each mass are quite different because the methods of measurement were distinct at different times, and the methods had been improved in many cases.…”
Section: Neutron Star Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties related to the contamination of the optical lightcurve by the accretion disk [7] and to the spectral characterization of the companion star [11] typically limit the accuracy of the measurements. Here I use the rather optimistic values quoted in reference [12] rather than the more conservative estimates of reference [7]. Having made the opposite choice would have affected only marginally the final result, the accuracy of which is mostly determined by the uncertainty in the radial velocity measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%