2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inclusive wealth index. A critical appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Kurniawan and Managi (2017) use the DEA model to estimate the entire productivity change, considering inclusive wealth (human, produced, and natural capitals), GDP, and carbon damage (using UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2014)). The present study notes that the framework in Arrow et al (2012Arrow et al ( , 2013 is popular but under debate; for example, Roman and Thiry (2016) raise certain limitations of the framework, in terms of its theoretical assumptions.…”
Section: Measuring Knowledge At the Macro Levelmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In addition, Kurniawan and Managi (2017) use the DEA model to estimate the entire productivity change, considering inclusive wealth (human, produced, and natural capitals), GDP, and carbon damage (using UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2014)). The present study notes that the framework in Arrow et al (2012Arrow et al ( , 2013 is popular but under debate; for example, Roman and Thiry (2016) raise certain limitations of the framework, in terms of its theoretical assumptions.…”
Section: Measuring Knowledge At the Macro Levelmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This is the case for a significant minority of beyond GDP indicators, such as the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (Cobb and Daly, 1989), World Bank's Adjusted Net Savings (Bolt et al, 2002) or UNEP's Inclusive Wealth Index (Managi and Kumar, 2018). However, monetisation is a subject of debate, due to questionable theoretical or technical assumptions (Thiry, 2014; Roman and Thiry, 2016). One main critique is that single monetary numeraire might overshadow a degradation of social or environmental capital when it is balanced with an increase of financial capital (which is called a 'weak' vision of sustainability) (Dietz & Neumayer, 2003).…”
Section: Beyond Gdp Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the decline of NC stops in 2045, and NC per capita then improves in line with population growth. However, these findings should be carefully interpreted, as the criticality and resilience of NC are not accounted for, and it is impossible to restore primary rainforests once destroyed [59]. First, the NCC is located in one of the largest tropical rainforests in the world (after the Amazon and Congo rainforests).…”
Section: Nc and Nc Per Capitamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it does not evaluate the impact of relocation outside the system. Although IW includes NC as an integrated index, it is still challenging to account for the criticality and resilience of NC [59]. With regard to natural disaster risk, it has been estimated how economic scale plays a role in resilience, but not economic structure.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%